From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BECC2BB1D for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99372074B for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XalrYwcp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E99372074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 87D5B8E0029; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:46:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 82E038E0001; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:46:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 76ACC8E0029; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:46:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0130.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.130]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6448E0001 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:46:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EFC180AD804 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:46:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76681031364.02.stage84_51bc494276917 X-HE-Tag: stage84_51bc494276917 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3512 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (mail-wr1-f65.google.com [209.85.221.65]) by imf32.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id v5so3676944wrp.12 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 05:46:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OMD/WRLziMR1WJFfbGKAOgrQLGevycyvXPwsGYuon6s=; b=XalrYwcpREMqevJD3++KPaj/cOH6EaWnDWpbojJbiLmHdPJa1wAgx2mSGMrJo5OoRN tTId5C00RgiBxpB/fF7i0bApOZZJ+qrkw1uNnADsZTZUnUsC0MdrFlMSFmrCTxm7l17c XooeX36oc9liHERTLw4jNTWea5y+Dd+SKDj1Fioc6VSjq7UFklWGrZ+fhYIeUrJ+EA7f 7+MRWQ1oYQNpeqESUwA5EqQOvCghV07JaxhWyIW3iVxCL9mY52UxttXQmEwVa12R6se3 qgvce5TEybNAuIb3VvFMYquY2LcwtWOtDVx1VfO0BXxXv0TCLGWHXMw/1rjIA2sAPFXq IhTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OMD/WRLziMR1WJFfbGKAOgrQLGevycyvXPwsGYuon6s=; b=YD7k9JFzPAfsaBUASD7/FudfRE8/jru0RzXgtCemqEqmh3f/Ek354CCYB2fKaDkat4 JwQ5f/7b+xFcztGxOwGTG/uE6JB/ms6gy22YNxMECYbOReVAI/yprSRMxJX9rp84VpG3 y3iyUPoP+vc0t51Z32t/tNmwEA1OCHIDRyyF5/EFpDyhFSFLqpZB9Pr8Jhdv1bZPvBWq CRxlXwfJzGqXEdKDzP4HmNLxYF7pQWsYCTGt2b1bANTjWP7PrSTgsniSbxEZXzJQLDir A1Z26BJKJpRgn2p2aDe+OsuwZtVd4DyP3FNWBLaAejYd7FsKrNqwssDmNd7iQJ3hAMkq t1Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZwLzsYo7NKbgg5YdcxNvtKGd+CKtzu/NHbtAZ4smUYQebhVJL1 0qq5/y5oLC6m2qhMQgTh2+Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ3/hkv2myDbosrGmRH2cj0AuLfcE2W1hYk2nUWq6FkQdKq4gVoLLNWPn0JWiFPi9kpg17jWA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5273:: with SMTP id l19mr2635421wrc.412.1586263560349; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 05:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm20642133wrv.18.2020.04.07.05.45.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Apr 2020 05:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:45:58 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: Wei Yang Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, rientjes@google.com, david@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/4] cleanup on do_pages_move() Message-ID: <20200407124558.obtv2le5rr4zc5ej@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200214003017.25558-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200214003017.25558-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000504, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:30:13AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >The logic in do_pages_move() is a little mess for audience to read and has >some potential error on handling the return value. Especially there are >three calls on do_move_pages_to_node() and store_status() with almost the >same form. Sounds this patch set is not picked up yet. Any thing else I need to do? -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me