From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CB4C2D0F0 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EC321655 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="B1OBTGwN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 58EC321655 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 05C648E0005; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:20:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 00CB58E0001; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:19:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E659D8E0005; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:19:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0150.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.150]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2E18E0001 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:19:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8939A4DB7 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:19:59 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76659797718.15.death64_9156a8f00f511 X-HE-Tag: death64_9156a8f00f511 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4725 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 031GIeiP192555; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:19:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=wf5Epvd2PkMi8L7E/eRCUSR0FOvN4Hz0yrwmht90YC0=; b=B1OBTGwNefZz4cvyBMFGvInJhvACIyJVqEmEJQzCbvhwtMRqnux8ubHv88gUbJgRISwc sgQmJYNDDopM8HVE9vyndAjbTtCMdIoiwwuWNaKk9Fq4z0IJsf82fb26GoPVQzVprvNE jH21TQWFzyg+ARWRC5s1+eg0c1gnH48JZE/Pn220xQB2xncVFBUZfdqqti5OQqxdAP3a xZ8NYJsN91wJTh/BMvle72pBf1hqadkuN3ealpyD49mz+IuVUHtzBFpryfpcFtHy++I9 gvkQFQO+C0rK+UPXM/DX+49O9GfxjF/ObUeOj/4KTwr59M/btMolfsLq8nOLGAXPI0Ow TQ== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 303aqhpxbu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 16:19:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 031GGsu9071569; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:17:56 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 302g2gwbn7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 16:17:56 +0000 Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 031GHspi005974; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:17:54 GMT Received: from ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com (/10.211.9.48) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 09:17:54 -0700 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:18:10 -0400 From: Daniel Jordan To: Michal Hocko Cc: Daniel Jordan , David Hildenbrand , Shile Zhang , Andrew Morton , Kirill Tkhai , Pavel Tatashin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fix tick timer stall during deferred page init Message-ID: <20200401161810.xvqikca2x46yqrlx@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> References: <20200311123848.118638-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> <20200401154217.GQ22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200401160048.GU22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200401160929.jwekhr24tb44odea@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> <20200401161243.GW22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200401161243.GW22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9578 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004010141 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9578 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004010141 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 01-04-20 12:09:29, Daniel Jordan wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 06:00:48PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 01-04-20 17:50:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > On 01.04.20 17:42, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > This needs a double checking but I strongly believe that the lock can be > > > > > simply dropped in this path. > > > > This is what my fix does, it limits the time the resize lock is held. > > Just remove it from the deferred intialization and add a comment that we > deliberately not taking the lock here because abc I think it has to be a little more involved because of the window where interrupts might allocate during deferred init, as Vlastimil pointed out a few years ago when the change was made. I'll explain myself in the changelog.