From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A202C43331 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0AA20714 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WTj9rUoG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3F0AA20714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DDC038E0005; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D8B558E0001; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:32:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C79138E0005; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:32:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0248.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.248]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE868E0001 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8B35828 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:32:35 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76659224670.17.humor88_33a8996b26029 X-HE-Tag: humor88_33a8996b26029 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4504 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com (mail-lj1-f194.google.com [209.85.208.194]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r24so25587940ljd.4 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:32:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8L1/PQnaYBXbzEXUweVQSVAcSQPDyAlUiX0T3JYuuFY=; b=WTj9rUoGT58FPH1IwytfIF8RhdaoHlpu/RcEVNmQlRH2NJFfn6hoxF+2xB1d56SnnK SkZwxfmiR21dCYC/Sy0hQbd5OKqPU+IUF9zvQc7vgtNIvWKf2sdBlX27FQf4V7qxpcZ3 d3RiayaUKlnU4Mc3IsTfY4R3V3tBt2+eZO/2R1JF4DRFe1aoIGa/yjgShd1KHrB0yhLZ gGryc5zPaSm6VmCTI/+DxVzJLIRvIPtkhvMua38Ja2OCEWr9HRbdCjEC9fq+xL9iakwh g0JwFYpEPuZUxT4aukz2BGVcSXXjoqCUhK/pP5qmDKtjccjgX0+h6jFrJYTqNMR3YynL +PvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8L1/PQnaYBXbzEXUweVQSVAcSQPDyAlUiX0T3JYuuFY=; b=B+9OwxeIq9fr9f1mUOpjE58xYnYOYanWq200YK4ua99dQ9iP1YP+SYO3f2QlTA9KTy y4QGlyvB6NzG1LE/QV9JyZBY/RNierSSS7dmW29gpGtywbIwf8TQjWhmD6exOvLT5ztj 5+v8tVk7G+FeyHi/LE6BRpoxPVRD4huZd2kZUf8slT8sA1Oso4p/36/mepuImvxqzTo9 pIcHlELn150HF3JbwAmhIBhfMPgPxCVZo4VlSkgUiCEvj84pOYka4tCgv5U/MtkogkWf 0Ee6gz8I57hbQTQ/kVQzyfOt6g2dxVZL9xokcgTCU0JABoPS73kOKtlwqguiEaa+JFbg UCIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZxY4tukx6iyHQpZedWBlD3AGeT7lHJk9fkrgCKI3FqNUvSi8yM L/hNzjFoYfCtAFfTZQXUC8g9c03qJMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJPwFtOAJ2kUBAdMVY1kqthd4AAiL4fiBBSlc6OWULAJhNSrhHxOjfin2SD/kjs0urj7hF1fw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1a5:: with SMTP id c5mr13087568ljn.113.1585744353370; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:32:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a10sm1531864lfg.33.2020.04.01.05.32.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:32:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:32:30 +0200 To: Michal Hocko Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , Joel Fernandes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, neilb@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, mgorman@suse.de, Andrew Morton , Josh Triplett , Lai Jiangshan , Mathieu Desnoyers , "Paul E. McKenney" , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu/tree: Use GFP_MEMALLOC for alloc memory to free memory pattern Message-ID: <20200401123230.GB32593@pc636> References: <20200331131628.153118-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20200331145806.GB236678@google.com> <20200331153450.GM30449@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200331161215.GA27676@pc636> <20200401070958.GB22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200401070958.GB22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:09:58AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 31-03-20 18:12:15, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > > > __GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_HIGH is the way to get an additional access to > > > memory reserves regarless of the sleeping status. > > > > > Michal, just one question here regarding proposed flags. Can we also > > tight it with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL flag? Means it also can repeat a few > > times in order to increase the chance of being success. > > yes, __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL is perfectly valid with __GFP_ATOMIC. Please > note that __GFP_ATOMIC, despite its name, doesn't imply an atomic > allocation which cannot sleep. Quite confusing, I know. A much better > name would be __GFP_RESERVES or something like that. > OK. Then we can use GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to try in more harder way. Thanks! -- Vlad Rezki