From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8640C43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB0720775 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="JKNo1auc" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9BB0720775 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 30FB66B0003; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:02:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2C0516B0005; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:02:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1D6666B0007; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:02:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0177.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077576B0003 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:02:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D893756773 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76630571892.14.head42_1547d6570c401 X-HE-Tag: head42_1547d6570c401 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3084 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by imf37.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=wFYim2QYkMQiybbppEhpuH5sqX3Z/8A63mEmIPHre14=; b=JKNo1aucxJAp9DOxiyfngvdx4z FiVtVyxTPHVQiB1L3KLRccnN+VGj5h5+wWfubMPSjtEvkQJXeVlhWxvg1EbJCAxokEYrDfuisCznr zYgkL0WFgzHIkty3g78gt3dn+EcRIR8HJFVRypK0JUp8d/YcfSxs3CK/l5fnXRktLQWooeDPQLjHq mmrWKXgkBHm5QEGMFjM0VThvKSCEJuDxteUX3+EvefFfai0UgAw5/s5+zCO3fG/B+wF4RtNhd3t/I 8xfThPBn7bcvR4mPGrraasbnI+0NcqTwEzd0NwmAWIyAllta1lGqcHw/Y1Ty/RWZwl9jafDacemUG 9TjAdbFw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGl44-0001kh-1W; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:00 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B539300096; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:01:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F491286C138B; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:01:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:01:55 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Zhenyu Ye Cc: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yuzhao@google.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, arm@kernel.org, xiexiangyou@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL feature Message-ID: <20200324150155.GH20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200324134534.1570-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200324134534.1570-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:45:28PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote: > In order to reduce the cost of TLB invalidation, the ARMv8.4 TTL > feature allows TLBs to be issued with a level allowing for quicker > invalidation. This series provide support for this feature. > > Patch 1 and Patch 2 was provided by Marc on his NV series[1] patches, > which detect the TTL feature and add __tlbi_level interface. I realy hate how it makes vma->vm_flags more important for tlbi.