From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6740EC4332B for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E6320768 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="W3My0/kq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 11E6320768 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shutemov.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 977156B00BE; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8D9976B00BF; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:40:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7A1766B00C0; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:40:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0082.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.82]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA906B00BE for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B62181AEF1E for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:40:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76610104914.03.legs52_79c5ee2943c50 X-HE-Tag: legs52_79c5ee2943c50 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5957 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id d23so330958ljg.13 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:40:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dXfbgXntHAqJkORLDplPcK3uRdwwGaipj0NNSSNRkKE=; b=W3My0/kqe4GSUvBRYSNeCxLRetpxovuA2EubrEcXHvECMKfgV7i1qsI10ajL3n5Spy y6mMwH2YLGS4Pc7bfO44lCELTKfi1WfPSaI7gsYtckhtSi55vKtr39eP2KI9XcM8DhTC O8S24T245kzt1pBnCugHuGrpmI+d7xi3UzI5/XpTcMXdcRn9NrjfbwjUF6TcFzgn/s0Q yS7VaRDStDbaTNS4PmysDhfHjuQjwWpif3MpCAKJKSnKGNI6qf59EeYr+sFVUeUBlILK H+IX9FpvI/3u4RTn6kt5SCjsXBXc1XZC+i8Gn5ekFkWDV47VG245c24tBfwExv1rFe5L 6q0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dXfbgXntHAqJkORLDplPcK3uRdwwGaipj0NNSSNRkKE=; b=q1C3tDvHuxnRYu0ctgceQL52g0RPnz/N13eh3r51VnK+coHmuOmUFueXcbnwhwTh6C lmtw5A8TCNfpXVSeP+8HvngjUVo09dj/qmfvORPqpdHvgJYIuKdu+6TrQWkcKB09LUk+ 3Ky88eWK78X/9imjYn40mbX6UupE9mIk6tNfIecce6S1RcSq9Y3Lgv96EKayd/6Zap4G DvZS4TUb/R7LG2YnWt1sMlGNM5NNMEmOd2Q//2YAyqpUSLLj2kB0j70ZC69IXJQI5rPu gG5QDyPvUDEctXp6dyuEHsDruTwj7PWrZJyZ9OCd0cxolENsDSShDDxFsN9lDnUj2uAa REFg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ35zHS8BPiK6MjZXfNkm862xM/ZDBT6MWAVKTMn+5Yzgftg+Xuv CwJ1MhnoOihwWZgDtMzeGiFI+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vseHJop6X8zK5vE01ZnCbmWQzXFU7FlKUmuZ1iaSSoHrH+T0fLRmlRNcrgZi/XBGUa5TjbZ3g== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2415:: with SMTP id k21mr267028ljk.9.1584574835031; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u10sm90760ljj.88.2020.03.18.16.40.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6855E1025D1; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:40:36 +0300 (+03) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:40:36 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Yang Shi Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, hughd@google.com, aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: khugepaged: fix potential page state corruption Message-ID: <20200318234036.aw3awl25gxrjd2jl@box> References: <1584573582-116702-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1584573582-116702-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:19:42AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote: > When khugepaged collapses anonymous pages, the base pages would be freed > via pagevec or free_page_and_swap_cache(). But, the anonymous page may > be added back to LRU, then it might result in the below race: > > CPU A CPU B > khugepaged: > unlock page > putback_lru_page > add to lru > page reclaim: > isolate this page > try_to_unmap > page_remove_rmap <-- corrupt _mapcount > > It looks nothing would prevent the pages from isolating by reclaimer. > > The other problem is the page's active or unevictable flag might be > still set when freeing the page via free_page_and_swap_cache(). The > putback_lru_page() would not clear those two flags if the pages are > released via pagevec, it sounds nothing prevents from isolating active > or unevictable pages. > > However I didn't really run into these problems, just in theory by visual > inspection. > > And, it also seems unnecessary to have the pages add back to LRU again since > they are about to be freed when reaching this point. So, clearing active > and unevictable flags, unlocking and dropping refcount from isolate > instead of calling putback_lru_page() as what page cache collapse does. > > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov > Cc: Hugh Dickins > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > --- > mm/khugepaged.c | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c > index b679908..f42fa4e 100644 > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c > @@ -673,7 +673,6 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte_t *pte, struct page *page, > src_page = pte_page(pteval); > copy_user_highpage(page, src_page, address, vma); > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(src_page) != 1, src_page); > - release_pte_page(src_page); > /* > * ptl mostly unnecessary, but preempt has to > * be disabled to update the per-cpu stats > @@ -687,6 +686,15 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte_t *pte, struct page *page, > pte_clear(vma->vm_mm, address, _pte); > page_remove_rmap(src_page, false); > spin_unlock(ptl); > + > + dec_node_page_state(src_page, > + NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_cache(src_page)); > + ClearPageActive(src_page); > + ClearPageUnevictable(src_page); > + unlock_page(src_page); > + /* Drop refcount from isolate */ > + put_page(src_page); > + > free_page_and_swap_cache(src_page); > } > } I will look at this closer tomorrow, but looks like an easier fix is to move release_pte_page() under ptl that we take just after it. -- Kirill A. Shutemov