From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E986AC0044D for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 01:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA58206EB for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 01:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="q3u295ya" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CA58206EB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DD46D6B0005; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D84B36B0006; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:24:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C9CCA6B0007; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:24:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0216.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.216]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4326B0005 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FF052BB for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 01:24:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76595850324.01.snake04_405a184a03b2e X-HE-Tag: snake04_405a184a03b2e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4022 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 01:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id t13so7872662wmi.3 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:24:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uRfG0mwZMLjMl4FPHbusrIQaUL5wynktLP8666hh0Ic=; b=q3u295yaWvJtyF0nX+itH6MgcSpzhi/WW183Rq9wGLBRLMK9E1D9n+YozKtG8wr/cW prWRdLnb5KqNYxGwbMr9NT1YXCcGu+szlyiWm3eF1GxPkmszRZ18gO9IH9tgVp4xnEHl scK3h4clMAHm72HKMPZn1BizqC782jmNPtEXG1D4qfrS9CitoHmvo7uLkih+M323gton nO57LOy9ng7Dlbj9WkBQ3/La2796jyVvUbYmYQKdMUxXLySTdoqmzQ9A61v8r/5qr4zm NPI6P9Hm96BHEFikcg2n9El7/tXtLB0Fv20UfC/MYXkAjVYXE3ib9ukBOvtb0Hicd8lN ow8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uRfG0mwZMLjMl4FPHbusrIQaUL5wynktLP8666hh0Ic=; b=ueBdxMzkaRhRaQL09up55FJRHx3l9dhFennIMsbrsBiybJUtmQKDYa+9oU2DRcVqgC rqU7bGgyn65GGBnK/6aFoN/oEdosopmRB4rLILzF1UBvQKtVhHl6sNxf9FWYYxHLbkL/ rdlvCx/499J9mgu+nQYep131HOeO29EuSmzOapxp2vbEJVldYWWFXNRZsLDsPC5mGZ5A 5vVdyIYl8hJGQZwY9pN0R86NKeg6qsSnC1GXWmH6ntZm2emLp14UenSUraJ7PjVCSHZf 6ihvMDJeu+SJeLfk6YQ+IT6kMqzco4hW61wT3aIliymEqR1Ti2AM5fwwemslHpjG1mXq XOmA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2uHeWIuAhcEtS4z8z+XJERUrpl/VyNKHKBYDZQYy5u/JnXUYOz Xuh3Q5OP5wQXyGJeKbuQzeE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vusw/MooirDZ5px6QSB4Q7IrKYKrBAJeE9hSb0Jn2vYN866yAQB9P7y0dj2KFOY68fFzrfwmg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b4c1:: with SMTP id d184mr19096815wmf.160.1584235440708; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm22200107wmm.6.2020.03.14.18.23.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 01:23:59 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Wei Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/swap_state.c: use the same way to count page in [add_to|delete_from]_swap_cache Message-ID: <20200315012359.uebl54wauvcpd5j4@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200314215912.1554-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> <20200315002101.GT22433@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200315002101.GT22433@bombadil.infradead.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000002, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 05:21:01PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 09:59:12PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> Function add_to_swap_cache() and delete_from_swap_cache() are counter >> parts, while currently they use different way to count page. >> >> It doesn't break any thing because we only have two size for PageAnon, >> but this is confusing and not a good practice. >> >> This patch corrects it by both using compound_nr(). > >You're converting in the wrong direction. hpage_nr_pages() is optimised >away when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is undefined, whereas compound_nr() >is not. Ok, I didn't think about the optimisation. Will use hpage_nr_pages() in v2. > >I also have this patch pending: >http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/commitdiff/192b635b428ae74f680574cdcc3d5e9d213fcb64 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me