linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mhocko@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/sparse.c: Use kvmalloc_node/kvfree to alloc/free memmap for the classic sparse
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:50:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200312225055.ksn4ujtkpjgkqiaf@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312142535.GK22433@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:25:35AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 06:34:16AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:08:22PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >> This change makes populate_section_memmap()/depopulate_section_memmap
>> >> much simpler.
>> >> 
>> >> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> v1->v2:
>> >>   The old version only used __get_free_pages() to replace alloc_pages()
>> >>   in populate_section_memmap().
>> >>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200307084229.28251-8-bhe@redhat.com
>> >> 
>> >>  mm/sparse.c | 27 +++------------------------
>> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> >> index bf6c00a28045..362018e82e22 100644
>> >> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> >> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> >> @@ -734,35 +734,14 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
>> >>  struct page * __meminit populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
>> >>  		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>> >>  {
>> >> -	struct page *page, *ret;
>> >> -	unsigned long memmap_size = sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>> >> -
>> >> -	page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(memmap_size));
>> >> -	if (page)
>> >> -		goto got_map_page;
>> >> -
>> >> -	ret = vmalloc(memmap_size);
>> >> -	if (ret)
>> >> -		goto got_map_ptr;
>> >> -
>> >> -	return NULL;
>> >> -got_map_page:
>> >> -	ret = (struct page *)pfn_to_kaddr(page_to_pfn(page));
>> >> -got_map_ptr:
>> >> -
>> >> -	return ret;
>> >> +	return kvmalloc_node(sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION,
>> >> +			     GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN, nid);
>> >
>> >Use of NOWARN here is inappropriate, because there's no fallback.
>> 
>> Hmm... this replacement is a little tricky.
>> 
>> When you look into kvmalloc_node(), it will do the fallback if the size is
>> bigger than PAGE_SIZE. This means the change here may not be equivalent as
>> before if memmap_size is less than PAGE_SIZE.
>> 
>> For example if :
>>   PAGE_SIZE = 64K 
>>   SECTION_SIZE = 128M
>> 
>> would lead to memmap_size = 2K, which is less than PAGE_SIZE.
>
>Yes, I thought about that.  I decided it wasn't a problem, as long as
>the struct page remains aligned, and we now have a guarantee that allocations
>above 512 bytes in size are aligned.  With a 64 byte struct page, as long

Where is this 512 bytes condition comes from?

>as we're allocating at least 8 pages, we know it'll be naturally aligned.
>
>Your calculation doesn't take into account the size of struct page.
>128M / 64k is indeed 2k, but you forgot to multiply by 64, which takes
>us to 128kB.

You are right. While would there be other combination? Or in the future?

For example, there are definitions of

#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS       26
#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS       24

Are we sure it won't break some thing?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-12 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-12 13:08 Baoquan He
2020-03-12 13:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-12 13:54   ` Baoquan He
2020-03-12 14:18   ` Wei Yang
2020-03-12 14:25     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-12 22:50       ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-03-13  0:00         ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-13 14:35           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-13 14:46           ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-13 14:57     ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-13 21:54       ` Wei Yang
2020-03-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Baoquan He
2020-03-13 14:56   ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-14  0:53     ` Baoquan He
2020-03-14 12:56       ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-15 13:01         ` Baoquan He
2020-03-14  1:12     ` Baoquan He
2020-03-13 15:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-16  7:14     ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200312225055.ksn4ujtkpjgkqiaf@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox