linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	<kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] kasan: fix -Wstringop-overflow warning
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:38:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311163800.a264d4ec8f26cca7bb5046fb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311134244.13016-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:42:44 +0800 Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:

> Compiling with gcc-9.2.1 points out below warnings.
> 
> In function 'memmove',
>     inlined from 'kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size' at lib/test_kasan.c:301:2:
> include/linux/string.h:441:9: warning: '__builtin_memmove' specified
> bound 18446744073709551614 exceeds maximum object size
> 9223372036854775807 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
> 
> Why generate this warnings?
> Because our test function deliberately pass a negative number in memmove(),
> so we need to make it "volatile" so that compiler doesn't see it.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(void)
>  {
>  	char *ptr;
>  	size_t size = 64;
> +	volatile size_t invalid_size = -2;
>  
>  	pr_info("invalid size in memmove\n");
>  	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -298,7 +299,7 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
> -	memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, -2);
> +	memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size);
>  	kfree(ptr);
>  }

Huh.  Why does this trick suppress the warning?

Do we have any guarantee that this it will contiue to work in future
gcc's?




  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-11 13:42 Walter Wu
2020-03-11 23:38 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-03-12  5:03   ` Walter Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200311163800.a264d4ec8f26cca7bb5046fb@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox