From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E55C3F2D7 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A762084E for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MbJqfxO3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 57A762084E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 027D76B0005; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:24:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F1A786B0006; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:24:45 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E09AB6B0007; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:24:45 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0068.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.68]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FD26B0005 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:24:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820B6180AD801 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:24:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76563646530.28.wire90_63b55abcce32e X-HE-Tag: wire90_63b55abcce32e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4004 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C86A52073D; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:24:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583468684; bh=XTbr7KlqNbwV2YhVNfxiPjrjjl5yMzT1EDmmNZjlgAk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MbJqfxO3HaXuCRow/zTICEzxaKpC1iTuAyYHnaLVioPjsRLoOFOt7QpWqb4F2J1PJ c8D07qpGHb7aaACU2w8hT9k8hOEaULu2Ho3gFc9VqJFWcHy0pRD30TDttjARJ/TZkj /MOQDiJHpVDd8pt9JqWWJPTAcFMSYKZwZtN2Ntoc= Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 20:24:43 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jaewon Kim Cc: walken@google.com, bp@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jaewon31.kim@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmap: show vm_unmapped_area error log Message-Id: <20200305202443.8de3598558336b1d75afbba7@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <5E605749.9050509@samsung.com> References: <20200304030206.1706-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> <5E605749.9050509@samsung.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:35:05 +0900 Jaewon Kim wrote: > Hello > > sorry for build warning. > I've changed %d to %ld reported by kbuild. > Let me attach full patch again below. > -------------------------------------------------- > > > Even on 64 bit kernel, the mmap failure can happen for a 32 bit task. > Virtual memory space shortage of a task on mmap is reported to userspace > as -ENOMEM. It can be confused as physical memory shortage of overall > system. > > The vm_unmapped_area can be called to by some drivers or other kernel > core system like filesystem. It can be hard to know which code layer > returns the -ENOMEM. > > Print error log of vm_unmapped_area with rate limited. Without rate > limited, soft lockup ocurrs on infinite mmap sytem call. > > i.e.) > <3>[ 576.024088] [6: mmap_infinite:14251] mmap: vm_unmapped_area err:-12 total_vm:0xfee08 flags:0x1 len:0xa00000 low:0x8000 high:0xf3f63000 > hm, I suppose that could be useful. Although the choice of which info to display could be a source of dispute. Why did you choose this info and omit other things? Perhaps a stack trace could also be useful? > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -2379,10 +2379,19 @@ extern unsigned long unmapped_area_topdown(struct vm_unmapped_area_info *info); > static inline unsigned long > vm_unmapped_area(struct vm_unmapped_area_info *info) > { > + unsigned long addr; > + > if (info->flags & VM_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN) > - return unmapped_area_topdown(info); > + addr = unmapped_area_topdown(info); > else > - return unmapped_area(info); > + addr = unmapped_area(info); > + > + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr) && printk_ratelimit()) { Please avoid using printk_ratelimit(). See the comment at the printk_ratelimit() definition site: /* * Please don't use printk_ratelimit(), because it shares ratelimiting state * with all other unrelated printk_ratelimit() callsites. Instead use * printk_ratelimited() or plain old __ratelimit(). */ > + pr_err("%s err:%ld total_vm:0x%lx flags:0x%lx len:0x%lx low:0x%lx high:0x%lx\n", > + __func__, addr, current->mm->total_vm, info->flags, > + info->length, info->low_limit, info->high_limit); > + } > + return addr; > }