From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF47C4BA0D for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A79A2067C for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FDhDvwjc" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A79A2067C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 288266B0003; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 238766B0005; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:48 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 14EAD6B0006; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:48 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0186.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.186]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09DB6B0003 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2787181AC9B6 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76530886614.15.rail04_63fc897f98920 X-HE-Tag: rail04_63fc897f98920 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4489 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:44:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582688686; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g4gojvp3vC3N2CngBOtMsPIUT4YDPupheuU+NRdhvhM=; b=FDhDvwjcA6TCdXH4uuwXEwooMeMBA5M0f7tcEzf6cu5En4II5iFHRG9UHa+6KoS+KFVIBc lmAPSXotNttREOk3d52lK7fcp1m+EgXuyy2p7wj2OWuVRwGqo1DwnQe8n0cNYk4p7I2vn8 LT4bxJ+9P4AyvnMJbHBvf9o0i3VTk/4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-143-WJgVg_aSNIeoVPp7BnFFgA-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WJgVg_aSNIeoVPp7BnFFgA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8117E107ACC5; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-39.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB16590519; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:44:33 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] mm/hotplug: Only use subsection map in VMEMMAP case Message-ID: <20200226034433.GE24216@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20200220043316.19668-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20200220103849.GG20509@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200221142847.GG4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200225100352.GN22443@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200225100352.GN22443@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 02/25/20 at 11:03am, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 21-02-20 22:28:47, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 02/20/20 at 11:38am, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Thu 20-02-20 12:33:09, Baoquan He wrote: > > > > Memory sub-section hotplug was added to fix the issue that nvdimm could > > > > be mapped at non-section aligned starting address. A subsection map is > > > > added into struct mem_section_usage to implement it. However, sub-section > > > > is only supported in VMEMMAP case. > > > > > > Why? Is there any fundamental reason or just a lack of implementation? > > > VMEMMAP should be really only an implementation detail unless I am > > > missing something subtle. > > > > Thanks for checking. > > > > VMEMMAP is one of two ways to convert a PFN to the corresponding > > 'struct page' in SPARSE model. I mentioned them as VMEMMAP case, or > > !VMEMMAP case because we called them like this previously when reviewed > > patches, hope it won't cause confusion. > > > > Currently, config ZONE_DEVICE depends on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. The > > subsection_map is added to struct mem_section_usage to track which sub > > section is present, VMEMMAP fills those bits which corresponding > > sub-sections are present, while !VMEMMAP, namely classic SPARSE, fills > > the whole map always. > > > > As we know, VMEMMAP builds page table to map a cluster of 'struct page' > > into the corresponding area of 'vmemmap'. Subsection hotplug can be > > supported naturally, w/o any change, just map needed region related to > > sub-sections on demand. For !VMEMMAP, it allocates memmap with > > alloc_pages() or vmalloc, thing is a little complicated, e.g the mixed > > section, boot memory occupies the starting area, later pmem hot added to > > the rear part. > > > > About !VMEMMAP which doesn't support sub-section hotplog, Dan said > > it's more because the effort and maintenance burden outweighs the > > benefit. And the current 64 bit ARCHes all enable > > SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE by default. > > OK, if this is the primary argument then make sure to document it in the > changelog (cover letter). Will add it when repost.