From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 08/13] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:11:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225141134.GU22443@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212171137.13872-9-david@redhat.com>
On Thu 12-12-19 18:11:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> virtio-mem wants to offline and remove a memory block once it unplugged
> all subblocks (e.g., using alloc_contig_range()). Let's provide
> an interface to do that from a driver. virtio-mem already supports to
> offline partially unplugged memory blocks. Offlining a fully unplugged
> memory block will not require to migrate any pages. All unplugged
> subblocks are PageOffline() and have a reference count of 0 - so
> offlining code will simply skip them.
>
> All we need an interface to trigger the "offlining" and the removing in a
> single operation - to make sure the memory block cannot get onlined by
> user space again before it gets removed.
Why does that matter? Is it really likely that the userspace would
interfere? What would be the scenario?
Or is still mostly about not requiring callers to open code this general
patter?
> To keep things simple, allow to only work on a single memory block.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 1 +
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index ba0dca6aac6e..586f5c59c291 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ extern void try_offline_node(int nid);
> extern int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
> extern int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
> extern void __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
> +extern int offline_and_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
>
> #else
> static inline bool is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long pfn,
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index da01453a04e6..d04369e6d3cc 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1825,4 +1825,39 @@ int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> return rc;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_memory);
> +
> +/*
> + * Try to offline and remove a memory block. Might take a long time to
> + * finish in case memory is still in use. Primarily useful for memory devices
> + * that logically unplugged all memory (so it's no longer in use) and want to
> + * offline + remove the memory block.
> + */
> +int offline_and_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + struct memory_block *mem;
> + int rc = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) ||
> + size != memory_block_size_bytes())
> + return rc;
> +
> + lock_device_hotplug();
> + mem = find_memory_block(__pfn_to_section(PFN_DOWN(start)));
> + if (mem)
> + rc = device_offline(&mem->dev);
> + /* Ignore if the device is already offline. */
> + if (rc > 0)
> + rc = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it.
> + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime.
> + */
> + if (!rc && try_remove_memory(nid, start, size))
> + BUG();
> + unlock_device_hotplug();
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory);
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
> --
> 2.23.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-12 17:11 [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/13] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-13 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-13 9:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/13] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotplug David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/13] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotunplug part 1 David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/13] mm: Export alloc_contig_range() / free_contig_range() David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/13] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotunplug part 2 David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/13] mm: Allow to offline unmovable PageOffline() pages via MEM_GOING_OFFLINE David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 18:26 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-02-25 18:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 21:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-02-25 22:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 16:27 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/13] virtio-mem: Allow to offline partially unplugged memory blocks David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/13] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 14:11 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-02-25 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-02 12:48 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-02 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/13] virtio-mem: Offline and remove completely unplugged memory blocks David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/13] virtio-mem: Better retry handling David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/13] mm/vmscan: Move count_vm_event(DROP_SLAB) into drop_slab() David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 14:13 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/13] mm/vmscan: Export drop_slab() and drop_slab_node() David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 14:58 ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-25 15:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 17:06 ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-25 17:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-12 17:11 ` [PATCH RFC v4 13/13] virtio-mem: Drop slab objects when unplug continues to fail David Hildenbrand
2019-12-13 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-12-16 11:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-24 6:58 ` teawater
2019-12-24 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-09 13:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-29 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 9:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-05 8:55 ` Alex Shi
2020-06-05 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-05 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-05 10:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-05 10:46 ` Alex Shi
2020-06-05 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-09 3:05 ` Alex Shi
2020-06-05 10:08 ` Alex Shi
2020-06-05 10:06 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200225141134.GU22443@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox