From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Avoid creating virtual address aliases in brk()/mmap()/mremap()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:46:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200219134602.GB21366@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200219123156.86952-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:31:56PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Currently the arm64 kernel ignores the top address byte passed to brk(),
> mmap() and mremap(). When the user is not aware of the 56-bit address
> limit or relies on the kernel to return an error, untagging such
> pointers has the potential to create address aliases in user-space.
> Passing a tagged address to munmap(), madvise() is permitted since the
> tagged pointer is expected to be inside an existing mapping.
>
> The current behaviour breaks the existing glibc malloc() implementation
> which relies on brk() with an address beyond 56-bit to be rejected by
> the kernel.
>
> Remove untagging in the above functions by partially reverting commit
> ce18d171cb73 ("mm: untag user pointers in mmap/munmap/mremap/brk"). In
> addition, update the arm64 tagged-address-abi.rst document accordingly.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1797052
> Fixes: ce18d171cb73 ("mm: untag user pointers in mmap/munmap/mremap/brk")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.x-
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> - Added note to tagged-address-abi.rst that this behaviour changed in v5.6 and
> some older kernel may still have the old behaviour.
>
> - Updated the commit log to make it clearer we broke the user ABI, also adding
> link to the Red Hat bugzilla entry.
Cheers, I'll queue this up as I have a couple of other arm64 fixes pending
now. (Andrew, please shout if you'd prefer to take it).
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-19 12:31 Catalin Marinas
2020-02-19 13:46 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-02-19 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200219134602.GB21366@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vstinner@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox