From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDBEC5ACC4 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDC524671 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ukHYLZC7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6EDC524671 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1B23A6B0006; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:06:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 163BC6B0008; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:06:51 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 09EA96B000A; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:06:51 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0120.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.120]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DA16B0006 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:06:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8015442B for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:06:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76508110980.03.rings96_3bb6691865561 X-HE-Tag: rings96_3bb6691865561 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2959 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from X1 (nat-ab2241.sltdut.senawave.net [162.218.216.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27675207FD; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:06:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582146409; bh=We7qiHyZF1+0bxnalw+B0B6unBvDDpo3FZ3UilP54wo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ukHYLZC7569bA3jMgJUE4Me0eScdonEH4QsdinQzJLb/YmaJEH255Pbk2YXN3mr++ 8Wg+cUdQTDSNrybE0lLFSy2X/bFPK8Dj5fyqLpxDt9xuTdPnYxpJKwIX5E0LNZZBZp gfmu61lnSEqsTfX2wTnJ6qyaDxsrEdO8My8VKDao= Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:06:48 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mina Almasry Cc: Mike Kravetz , shuah , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , Greg Thelen , open list , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/9] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter Message-Id: <20200219130648.83e6810848774c6fd649c445@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20200211151906.637d1703e4756066583b89da@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:05:41 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 3:19 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:31:20 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > > > > > These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb > > > memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches > > > add the charging and uncharging of the counter. > > > > We're still pretty thin on review here, but as it's v12 and Mike > > appears to be signed up to look at this work, I'll add them to -next to > > help move things forward. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Since the patches were merged into -next there have been build fixes > and test fixes and some review comments. Would you like me to submit > *new* patches to address these, or would you like me to squash the > fixes into my existing patch series and submit another iteration of > the patch series? What you did worked OK ;) Please check the end result next time I release a kernel.