From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparsemem: get physical address to page struct instead of virtual address to pfn
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:36:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207033636.GS8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4jDVe-LZ5OqyV3wJ=7xcXsp5WEtf79fqFPTpRs5KcpA8g@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/06/20 at 07:21pm, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:10 PM Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > On 02/06/20 at 06:19pm, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:17 PM Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > > > index b5da121bdd6e..56816f653588 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > > > @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > > > /* Align memmap to section boundary in the subsection case */
> > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) &&
> > > > section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr) != start_pfn)
> > > > - memmap = pfn_to_kaddr(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr));
> > > > + memmap = pfn_to_page(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr));
> > >
> > > Yes, this looks obviously correct. This might be tripping up
> > > makedumpfile. Do you see any practical effects of this bug? The kernel
> > > mostly avoids ->section_mem_map in the vmemmap case and in the
> > > !vmemmap case section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr) should always equal
> > > start_pfn.
> >
> > The practical effects is that the memmap for the first unaligned section will be lost
> > when destroy namespace to hot remove it. Because we encode the ->section_mem_map
> > into mem_section, and get memmap from the related mem_section to free it in
> > section_deactivate(). In fact in vmemmap, we don't need to encode the ->section_mem_map
> > with memmap.
>
> Right, but can you actually trigger that in the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n case?
I think no, the lost memmap should only happen in vmemmap case.
>
> > By the way, sub-section support is only valid in vmemmap case, right?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Seems yes from code, but I don't find any document to prove it.
>
> check_pfn_span() enforces this requirement.
Thanks for your confirmation. Do you mind if I add some document
sentences somewhere make clear this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 23:16 [PATCH 0/3] Fixes "mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug" Wei Yang
2020-02-06 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/sparsemem: adjust memmap only for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wei Yang
2020-02-07 2:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 11:06 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparsemem: get physical address to page struct instead of virtual address to pfn Wei Yang
2020-02-07 2:19 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 3:10 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 3:21 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 3:36 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-02-07 4:05 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 11:13 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 12:14 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 16:44 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 10:51 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 11:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-09 13:50 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-09 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-10 0:36 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 4:11 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 10:53 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/sparsemem: avoid memmap overwrite for non-SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wei Yang
2020-02-07 2:06 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 3:50 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 11:02 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207033636.GS8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox