From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
bsingharora@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/hotplug: Only respect mem= parameter during boot stage
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:58:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206025843.GL8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1356631d-30b6-e967-9874-6c48c25304cf@suse.com>
On 02/04/20 at 08:53am, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 04.02.20 06:06, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In commit 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem=
> > parameter") a global varialbe max_mem_size is added to store
> > the value parsed from 'mem= ', then checked when memory region is
> > added. This truly stops those DIMMs from being added into system memory
> > during boot-time.
> >
> > However, it also limits the later memory hotplug functionality. Any
> > DIMM can't be hotplugged any more if its region is beyond the
> > max_mem_size. We will get errors like:
> >
> > [ 216.387164] acpi PNP0C80:02: add_memory failed
> > [ 216.389301] acpi PNP0C80:02: acpi_memory_enable_device() error
> > [ 216.392187] acpi PNP0C80:02: Enumeration failure
> >
> > This will cause issue in a known use case where 'mem=' is added to
> > the hypervisor. The memory that lies after 'mem=' boundary will be
> > assigned to KVM guests. After commit 357b4da50a62 merged, memory
> > can't be extended dynamically if system memory on hypervisor is not
> > sufficient.
> >
> > So fix it by also checking if it's during boot-time restricting to add
> > memory. Otherwise, skip the restriction.
> >
> > And also add this use case to document of 'mem=' kernel parameter.
> >
> > Fixes: 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem= parameter")
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Thanks, Juergen. Seems I should add more details to explain this. Will
post v4 with your 'Reviewed-by'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-04 5:06 Baoquan He
2020-02-04 7:53 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-02-06 2:58 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-02-06 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 9:44 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-14 10:53 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200206025843.GL8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox