linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: Easier calculation to get pages to next section boundary
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:48:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206024816.GK8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206022644.6u7pxf7by2w5trmi@master>

On 02/06/20 at 02:26am, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:37:36AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> >On 02/06/20 at 08:13am, Baoquan He wrote:
> >> On 02/06/20 at 07:50am, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:19:45AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> > >On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 02:52:51PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> > >>Let's use a calculation that's easier to understand and calculates the
> >> > >>same result. Reusing existing macros makes this look nicer.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>We always want to have the number of pages (> 0) to the next section
> >> > >>boundary, starting from the current pfn.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Suggested-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> >> > >>Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >> > >>Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> >> > >>Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> >> > >>Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> >> > >>Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> >> > >>Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >> > >
> >> > >Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> >> > >
> >> > >BTW, I got one question about hotplug size requirement.
> >> > >
> >> > >I thought the hotplug range should be section size aligned, while taking a
> >> > >look into current code function check_hotplug_memory_range() guard the range.
> >> 
> >> A good question. The current code should be block size aligned. I
> >> remember in some places we assume each block comprise all the sections.
> >> Can't imagine one or some of them are half section filled.
> >
> >I could be wrong, half filled block may not cause problem. 
> >
> 
> David must be angry about our flooding the mail list :-)

Believe he won't, :-) If you like, we can talk off line.

> 
> Check the code again, there are two memory range check:
> 
>   * check_hotplug_memory_range(), block/section aligned
>   * check_pfn_span(), subsection aligned
> 
> The second check, check_pfn_span() in __add_pages(), enable the capability to
> add a memory range with subsection size.
> 
> This means hotplug still keeps section alignment.

memremap_pages() also call add_pages(), it doesn't have the
check_hotplug_memory_range() invocation. check_pfn_span() is made for
it specifically.

> 
> BTW, __add_pages() share the same logic as __remove_pages(). Why not change it
> too? Do I miss something or I don't have the latest source code?

Good question, and I think it need. Just David is refactoring/cleaning
up the remove_pages() code path, this is found out by Segher from patch
reviewing.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-06  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-05 13:52 David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 23:19 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:50   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06  0:13     ` Baoquan He
2020-02-06  0:37       ` Baoquan He
2020-02-06  2:26         ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06  2:48           ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-02-06  4:34             ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06  4:39               ` Baoquan He
2020-02-06  9:01                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 11:38                   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06  1:46 ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200206024816.GK8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox