From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, vbabka@suse.cz, cl@linux.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/migrate.c: also overwrite error when it is bigger than zero
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:46:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200124144643.GV29276@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200124141538.GA12509@richard>
On Fri 24-01-20 22:15:38, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 08:21:27AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >[Sorry I have missed this patch previously]
> >
>
> No problem, thanks for your comment.
>
> >On Sun 19-01-20 14:57:53, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> If we get here after successfully adding page to list, err would be
> >> 1 to indicate the page is queued in the list.
> >>
> >> Current code has two problems:
> >>
> >> * on success, 0 is not returned
> >> * on error, if add_page_for_migratioin() return 1, and the following err1
> >> from do_move_pages_to_node() is set, the err1 is not returned since err
> >> is 1
> >
> >This made my really scratch my head to grasp. So essentially err > 0
> >will happen when we reach the end of the loop and rely on the
> >out_flush flushing to migrate the batch. Then err contains the
> >add_page_for_migratioin return value. And that would leak to the
> >userspace.
> >
> >What would you say about the following wording instead?
> >"
> >out_flush part of do_pages_move is responsible for migrating the last
> >batch that accumulated while processing the input in the loop.
> >do_move_pages_to_node return value is supposed to override any
> >preexisting error (e.g. when the user input is garbage) but the current
>
> I am afraid I have a different understanding here.
>
> If we jump to out_flush on the test of node_isset(), err is -EACCESS. Current
> logic would return this instead of the error from do_move_pages_to_node().
> Seems we don't override -EACCESS.
And this is the expected logic. The unexpected behavior is the one you
have fixed by this patch because err = 1 wouldn't get overriden and that
should have been.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-19 6:57 Wei Yang
2020-01-21 1:53 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-21 2:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-21 19:33 ` John Hubbard
2020-01-22 0:42 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-22 1:29 ` John Hubbard
2020-01-21 19:30 ` Yang Shi
2020-01-22 0:41 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-24 7:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-24 14:15 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-24 14:46 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-01-24 15:28 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200124144643.GV29276@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox