From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164CCC33CAA for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E670322527 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:22:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E670322527 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8CCBB6B06A6; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 20:22:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 87C6E6B06A7; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 20:22:49 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 792C06B06A8; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 20:22:49 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0171.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630FC6B06A6 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 20:22:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A5AE8248076 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:22:49 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76399892058.10.play92_6fd1f05423215 X-HE-Tag: play92_6fd1f05423215 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1910 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:22:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jan 2020 17:22:46 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,344,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="275166647" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2020 17:22:44 -0800 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:22:56 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Michal Hocko Cc: Wei Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm/migrate.c: use break instead of goto out_flush Message-ID: <20200121012256.GB1567@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200119030636.11899-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20200119030636.11899-9-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20200120100328.GS18451@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120100328.GS18451@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:03:28AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >On Sun 19-01-20 11:06:36, Wei Yang wrote: >> Label out_flush is just outside the loop, so break the loop is enough. > >I find the explicit label easier to follow than breaking out of the >loop. Especially when there is another break out of the loop with a >different label. > >While the patch is correct I find the resulting code worse readable. > ok, as you wish. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me