From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDD1C33CB7 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B841A20678 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:36:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B841A20678 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5634A6B0594; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:36:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4EC986B0595; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:36:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3DB476B0596; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:36:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0225.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.225]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250E36B0594 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:36:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D41D9181AC9CB for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:36:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76396146120.26.girl21_5474c767c5e51 X-HE-Tag: girl21_5474c767c5e51 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2075 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:36:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2020 16:36:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,340,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="374184672" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2020 16:36:17 -0800 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:36:28 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: David Rientjes Cc: Wei Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/page_alloc.c: rename free_pages_check_bad() to check_free_page_bad() Message-ID: <20200120003628.GC26292@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200119131408.23247-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20200119131408.23247-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000005, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 02:07:04PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: >On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Wei Yang wrote: > >> free_pages_check_bad() is the counterpart of check_new_page_bad(), while >> their naming convention is a little different. >> >> Use verb at first and singular form. >> > >I think if you agree with the suggestion in patch 1/4 to fix the issue >with bad page reporting that it would likely be better to fold patches 2 >and 3 into that change. I am ok with this, while would it be confusing for review? -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me