linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,
	alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm: thp: grab the lock before manipulation defer list
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:59:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114105921.eo2vdwikrvtt3gkb@box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114103112.o6ozdbkfnzdsc2ke@box>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:31:12PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 11-01-20 03:03:52, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:30:54PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> > > > As all the other places, we grab the lock before manipulate the defer list.
> > > > Current implementation may face a race condition.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, the potential race would be:
> > > > 
> > > >     CPU1                      CPU2
> > > >     mem_cgroup_move_account   split_huge_page_to_list
> > > >       !list_empty
> > > >                                 lock
> > > >                                 !list_empty
> > > >                                 list_del
> > > >                                 unlock
> > > >       lock
> > > >       # !list_empty might not hold anymore
> > > >       list_del_init
> > > >       unlock
> > > 
> > > I don't think this particular race is possible. Both parties take page
> > > lock before messing with deferred queue, but anytway:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > I am confused, if the above race is not possible then what would be a
> > real race? We really do not want to have a patch with a misleading
> > changelog, do we?
> 
> The alternative is to make sure that all page_deferred_list() called with
> page lock taken.
> 
> I'll look into it.

split_huge_page_to_list() has page lock taken.

free_transhuge_page() is in the free path and doesn't susceptible to the
race.

deferred_split_scan() is trickier. list_move() should be safe against
list_empty() as it will not produce false-positive list_empty().
list_del_init() *should* (correct me if I'm wrong) be safe because the page
is freeing and memcg will not touch the page anymore.

deferred_split_huge_page() is a problematic one. It called from
page_remove_rmap() path witch does require page lock. I don't see any
obvious way to exclude race with mem_cgroup_move_account() here.
Anybody else?

Wei, could you rewrite the commit message with deferred_split_huge_page()
as a race source instead of split_huge_page_to_list()?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09 14:30 Wei Yang
2020-01-09 18:52 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-09 18:58 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-11  0:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-12  2:28   ` Wei Yang
2020-01-12 22:57     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-13  0:44       ` Wei Yang
2020-01-13  7:36         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-13  8:23           ` Wei Yang
2020-01-14  9:31   ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-14 10:31     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-14 10:59       ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2020-01-14 20:57         ` David Rientjes
2020-01-15  1:19           ` Wei Yang
2020-01-15  1:07         ` Wei Yang
2020-01-15  3:26           ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114105921.eo2vdwikrvtt3gkb@box \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox