From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA647C33C9B for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793932072A for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:44:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 793932072A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 149DC8E0007; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:44:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0F96A8E0006; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:44:17 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 00F398E0007; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:44:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0210.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.210]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89C08E0006 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:44:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 912B13CFB for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76352015712.08.low22_7c92fd63d3c00 X-HE-Tag: low22_7c92fd63d3c00 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1928 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 902F21C2597; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:44:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:44:12 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: kernel list , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: OOM killer not nearly agressive enough? Message-ID: <20200107204412.GA29562@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.004972, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I updated my userspace to x86-64, and now chromium likes to eat all the memory and bring the system to standstill. Unfortunately, OOM killer does not react: I'm now running "ps aux", and it prints one line every 20 seconds or more. Do we agree that is "unusable" system? I attempted to do kill =66rom other session. Do we agree that OOM killer should have reacted way sooner? Is there something I can tweak to make it behave more reasonably? Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl4U7ZwACgkQMOfwapXb+vJItgCgomm9fd1Ox5Tq38bSgamMSUzI pnoAoKnPsJvjVAIfinjbm6ZSm2QYaGUe =Uklt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--