linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/rmap.c: split huge pmd when it really is
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:03:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107120333.ncvds3atyfiilxi3@box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200103140128.GA26268@richard>

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 10:01:28PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 04:26:50PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 09:05:54PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 03:18:46PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 06:28:56AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> >>When page is not NULL, function is called by try_to_unmap_one() with
> >> >>TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD set. There are two cases to call try_to_unmap_one()
> >> >>with TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD set:
> >> >>
> >> >>  * unmap_page()
> >> >>  * shrink_page_list()
> >> >>
> >> >>In both case, the page passed to try_to_unmap_one() is PageHead() of the
> >> >>THP. If this page's mapping address in process is not HPAGE_PMD_SIZE
> >> >>aligned, this means the THP is not mapped as PMD THP in this process.
> >> >>This could happen when we do mremap() a PMD size range to an un-aligned
> >> >>address.
> >> >>
> >> >>Currently, this case is handled by following check in __split_huge_pmd()
> >> >>luckily.
> >> >>
> >> >>  page != pmd_page(*pmd)
> >> >>
> >> >>This patch checks the address to skip some work.
> >> >
> >> >I am sorry to forget address Kirill's comment in 1st version.
> >> >
> >> >The first one is the performance difference after this change for a PTE
> >> >mappged THP.
> >> >
> >> >Here is the result:(in cycle)
> >> >
> >> >        Before     Patched
> >> >
> >> >        963        195
> >> >        988        40
> >> >        895        78
> >> >
> >> >Average 948        104
> >> >
> >> >So the change reduced 90% time for function split_huge_pmd_address().
> >
> >Right.
> >
> >But do we have a scenario, where the performance of
> >split_huge_pmd_address() matters? I mean, it it called as part of rmap
> >walk, attempt to split huge PMD where we don't have huge PMD should be
> >within noise.
> 
> Sorry for my poor English.
> 
> I don't catch the meaning of the last sentence. "within noise" here means
> non-huge PMD is an expected scenario and we could tolerate this? 

Basically, I doubt that this change would bring any measurable perfromance
benefits on a real workload.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-07 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-23 22:28 Wei Yang
2019-12-23 23:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-24  1:56   ` Wei Yang
2019-12-27 15:13     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-29 22:07       ` Wei Yang
2020-01-03  7:18 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-03 13:05   ` Wei Yang
2020-01-03 13:26     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-03 14:01       ` Wei Yang
2020-01-07 12:03         ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2020-01-08  0:36           ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200107120333.ncvds3atyfiilxi3@box \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox