linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: "hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"vdavydov.dev@gmail.com" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm, memcg: reset memcg's memory.{min, low} for reclaiming itself
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:45:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191226214539.GC22734@tower.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577174006-13025-4-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 02:53:24AM -0500, Yafang Shao wrote:
> memory.{emin, elow} are set in mem_cgroup_protected(), and the values of
> them won't be changed until next recalculation in this function. After
> either or both of them are set, the next reclaimer to relcaim this memcg
> may be a different reclaimer, e.g. this memcg is also the root memcg of
> the new reclaimer, and then in mem_cgroup_protection() in get_scan_count()
> the old values of them will be used to calculate scan count, that is not
> proper. We should reset them to zero in this case.
> 
> Here's an example of this issue.
> 
>     root_mem_cgroup
>          /
>         A   memory.max=1024M memory.min=512M memory.current=800M
> 
> Once kswapd is waked up, it will try to scan all MEMCGs, including
> this A, and it will assign memory.emin of A with 512M.
> After that, A may reach its hard limit(memory.max), and then it will
> do memcg reclaim. Because A is the root of this reclaimer, so it will
> not calculate its memory.emin. So the memory.emin is the old value
> 512M, and then this old value will be used in
> mem_cgroup_protection() in get_scan_count() to get the scan count.
> That is not proper.

Good catch!

But it seems to be a bug introduced with the implementation of the proportional
reclaim. So I'd remove it from the patchset, add the "Fixes" tag and cc stable@.
Then it will have chances to be backported to stable trees.

Thank you!

> 
> Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f35fcca..2e78931 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6287,8 +6287,17 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root,
>  
>  	if (!root)
>  		root = root_mem_cgroup;
> -	if (memcg == root)
> +	if (memcg == root) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Reset memory.(emin, elow) for reclaiming the memcg
> +		 * itself.
> +		 */
> +		if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup) {
> +			memcg->memory.emin = 0;
> +			memcg->memory.elow = 0;
> +		}
>  		return MEMCG_PROT_NONE;
> +	}
>  
>  	usage = page_counter_read(&memcg->memory);
>  	if (!usage)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-26 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-24  7:53 [PATCH v2 0/5] protect page cache from freeing inode Yafang Shao
2019-12-24  7:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm, memcg: reduce size of struct mem_cgroup by using bit field Yafang Shao
2019-12-26 21:23   ` Roman Gushchin
2019-12-27  1:03     ` Yafang Shao
2019-12-24  7:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm, memcg: introduce MEMCG_PROT_SKIP for memcg zero usage case Yafang Shao
2019-12-26 21:36   ` Roman Gushchin
2019-12-27  1:09     ` Yafang Shao
2019-12-24  7:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm, memcg: reset memcg's memory.{min, low} for reclaiming itself Yafang Shao
2019-12-26 21:45   ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2019-12-27  1:11     ` Yafang Shao
2019-12-24  7:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm: make memcg visible to lru walker isolation function Yafang Shao
2020-01-04  3:35   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-04  7:26     ` Yafang Shao
2020-01-04 21:23       ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-05  1:43         ` Yafang Shao
2020-01-06  0:17           ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-06 14:41             ` Yafang Shao
2020-01-06 21:31               ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-07 13:22                 ` Yafang Shao
2019-12-24  7:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] memcg, inode: protect page cache from freeing inode Yafang Shao
2019-12-25 13:01   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-25 13:18   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-26  5:09     ` Yafang Shao
2020-01-04  3:55   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-04  7:42     ` Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191226214539.GC22734@tower.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox