From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29DDC2D0D2 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FAD2073A for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="wolt0qCh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64FAD2073A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D75D98E0005; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D25BF8E0001; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:25:54 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C3B668E0005; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:25:54 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0140.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.140]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA618E0001 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A361181AC9C6 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76297839828.04.twig43_8acd519201f47 X-HE-Tag: twig43_8acd519201f47 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2031 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from X1 (nat-ab2241.sltdut.senawave.net [162.218.216.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC643206CB; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:25:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577139953; bh=5aMaM5UVt54PsEDXZJzFRawKZxOG0oyvOuZbI/OOOGU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wolt0qChOLq8tmz5oBNi17H9c7dvEGVOx9+4veDYvCwtoC0bz9UAWX1nKyhXGZjeH k+3OVfD7KJ5VjAgKFpLnjj65qa2B4VmsK5uvIbCht/e4F50eP5R53/w0gy7u8w0v9+ rgBmAOO1xjaoZQgYilKT3pJ2XsCDxBPxhZRqCWkM= Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:25:52 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: "Willhalm, Thomas" , Dan Williams , "Bruggeman, Otto G" , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs Message-Id: <20191223142552.d9bd85e588196d17fb90ee2e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20191220142548.7118-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <20191220142548.7118-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:25:46 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" wrote: > The two get_unmapped_area() implementations have to be fixed to provide > THP-friendly mappings if above-47bit hint address is specified. > Do we need a cc:stable for these?