linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol.c: move mem_cgroup_id_get_many under CONFIG_MMU
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:46:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191217144652.GA7272@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <392D7C59-5538-4A9B-8974-DB0B64880C2C@lca.pw>

On Tue 17-12-19 09:16:36, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Dec 17, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> wrote:
> > 
> > Let's just add __maybe_unused, since it seems like what we want in this scenario -- it avoids new users having to enter preprocessor madness, while also not polluting the build output.
> 
> __maybe_unused should only be used in the last resort as it mark the compiler to catch the real issues in the future. In this case, it might be better just ignore it as only non-realistic compiling test would use !CONFIG_MMU in this case.

yes, I would just ignore this warning. Btw. it seems that this is
enabled by default for -Wall. Is this useful for kernel builds at
all? Does it realistically help discovering real issues? If not then
can we simply blacklist it?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-17 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-17  6:47 Kuninori Morimoto
2019-12-17  9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-17 13:54   ` Chris Down
2019-12-17 14:16     ` Qian Cai
2019-12-17 14:37       ` Chris Down
2019-12-17 15:09         ` Qian Cai
2019-12-17 14:46       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-12-17 15:04         ` Qian Cai
2019-12-17 15:13           ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-17 15:17             ` Qian Cai
2019-12-17 15:09         ` Chris Down
2019-12-17 15:19           ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-17 15:28             ` Chris Down
2019-12-17 15:32               ` Chris Down
2019-12-17 15:34               ` Qian Cai
2019-12-17 15:46               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191217144652.GA7272@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox