From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31C8C43603 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D2D2073B for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="G2E2Di2y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 63D2D2073B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shutemov.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DAE916B32AB; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:44:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D5EC76B32AC; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:44:32 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BD8976B32AD; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:44:32 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0143.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.143]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D2E6B32AB for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:44:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2333545D8 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:44:32 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76253282784.05.talk52_a6864af68f34 X-HE-Tag: talk52_a6864af68f34 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3816 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id k8so24545557ljh.5 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:44:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XdzBTtaNquqJQQc4imgAleeVldIWzikxbiqcx5Oj4Uw=; b=G2E2Di2yoRVC6LiYhg1kO50cH34YBeUkTvPVd13zyFgGT5Zhg5360ZibuMIwXzjzZT x4RiYwW9WBQI4t5kV+nbfqmKJPgz3nEu/Ok4dxgoc7DZqCrMPUustH30XN1suYlnEOKN qSs+GuTWkYCPlMdMRJUtL7WvIn7cs594EGRqqvxKMvO3GEybm9jv82wo8Mn2/VqwMqxE KXW1WBNB42/ak4h0bBQwEC/4bP+zQP3pUgvQNe+eq8+TJLAcHJVyjkJsm1KHurbFMSTl 9gQ2vhMXWr3Gw4CrbO87BXw1zG/y++JkWskieWBimgUr+G07/l3wZy9bukniaD1h9hSP JB+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XdzBTtaNquqJQQc4imgAleeVldIWzikxbiqcx5Oj4Uw=; b=oj9ti0eYccM3azmV/MYctJqQjFGvO58zyPuvamdGbexUwinJLGmFgk5tAwh6K5OBWM Dsv3zDWFkSSfFgoeFq8BJADbDHufqMhCCBL7wSXd/pDTAD8pENWncA1NUw05qI+MxgVe o2moitEsc9c8YPPsxT6euO81OdJCVJigRmKtNIX4GeACkK8ywzgOb4maL6PTBuX69WLb au9SBlPI10cUWaMFBtFUlO1/UlGow+jEv40ZSWMT+Flh6T0Vu5OI5a0Iz8ljnkfUYwd0 eeTf/V8/d3OObMY3rBj6N3LsRUV02TurVxfrDVma/enp/WlJpO374nuj817zsrDw1zag BJaA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU/wVO1pPREfyf8nXaWmRVEzzCt32u6sANbIfjQLwRECZC+kr3y W1mH/UMPc37iRrD3fvHE/vwsgw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwSQs81SgJhtxgOyKyhGTp7SwuA3qzUk/Yet+/zmbJc38BOSBCKb5y1J1lYoQveRVIKsu2I3A== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:814e:: with SMTP id t14mr2470350ljg.149.1576079069978; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d25sm1400170ljj.51.2019.12.11.07.44.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A073E101218; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 18:44:29 +0300 (+03) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 18:44:29 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jerome Glisse , Paolo Bonzini , "aarcange@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] mm: also set VMA in khugepaged range invalidation Message-ID: <20191211154429.7tscxcqk725guyce@box> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:29:21AM +0000, Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU wrote: > MMU notifier client may need the VMA for extra info. > This change is needed by the remote mapping feature that inspects anon VMAs > with huge mappings. The change itself is okay, but commit message should be better. Do we have any user of mmu notifiers in current kernel that affected by the missing vma here? And subject starting with 'also' looks wrong to me. -- Kirill A. Shutemov