From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
jgross@suse.com, william.kucharski@oracle.com, mingo@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hotplug: Only respect mem= parameter during boot stage
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 12:33:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210113341.GG10404@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210104303.GN2984@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On Tue 10-12-19 18:43:03, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 12/10/19 at 11:28am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 10-12-19 15:24:53, Baoquan He wrote:
[...]
> > > But after system bootup, we should be able to hot add/remove any memory
> > > board. This should not be restricted by a boot-time kernel parameter
> > > 'mme='. This is what I am trying to fix.
> >
> > This is a simple statement without any actual explanation on why. Why is
> > hotplug memory special? What is the usecase? Who would want to use mem
> > parameter and later expect a memory above the restrected area to be
> > hotplugable?
>
> The why is 'mem=' is used to restrict the amount of system ram during
> boot. We have two ways to add system memory, one is installing DIMMs
> before boot, the other is hot adding memory after boot. Without David's
> use case, we may need redefine 'mem=' and change its documentation in
> kernel-parameters.txt, if we don't want to fix it like this. Otherwise,
> 'mem=' will limit the system's upper system ram always, that is not
> expected.
I really do not see why. It seems a pretty consistent behavior to me.
Because it essentially cut any memory above the given size. If a new
hotplugable memory fits into that cap then it just shows up. Quite
contrary I would consider it unexpected that a memory higher than the
given mem=XYZ is really there. But I do recognize a real usecase
mentioned elsewhere which beats the consistency argument here because
all setups where such a restriction would be really important are
debugging/workaround AFAICS.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-06 15:05 Baoquan He
2019-12-09 9:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-09 10:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-09 10:24 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-12-09 11:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-09 11:08 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-12-09 11:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10 8:04 ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 7:24 ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 10:28 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 10:43 ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 11:33 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-12-10 12:55 ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 14:05 ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-11 13:20 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210113341.GG10404@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox