From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D98BC2D0BF for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A1A2073B for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:56:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F0A1A2073B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 866EE6B2BB1; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:56:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 817286B2BB2; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:56:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 706026B2BB3; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:56:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0045.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.45]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C486B2BB1 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:56:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E33D4181AEF23 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:56:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76248776436.08.page42_7143a69ea3459 X-HE-Tag: page42_7143a69ea3459 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 8085 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id t2so19312353wrr.1 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:56:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wiDeNqk4JUYH6LbyjP3mNqGyXwUCv0yPtvfwbu07E84=; b=dYoNffHN7tcbjJQ0rqyzcsNZ5799gIrXS3hOBAxsmXN8Ooz8muWF5sivzP7GIBPibA wjUB8jdZ7tZWCifPrfrtqUaAfjA5E+kCY6Afkem37vAWNX+fPdjCQAvpJcd9D7HiqHRq jhHNuTTqxmk+NIDt/UldobAeRZ2XBJ4ngBGtZeWQvjZZaQnWYh+tMHWLSlov/FjODt46 XYmyXjWQ3kfk9zLCc6BrwlpLJjxBN5rrm+ZLq/p1/oGlHxISOnGsadlLOhgQ40tcbP3i 3Ly3DvC/Miif6pgKs9YjYFyCuzcO+i+RVENUz2vrxLWGuV5If+2rFvHlaLzp5jUQpxK/ JmyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVU1S8hJon4zqkJJW2Dt21O7ThRYYS0Gqig9RkQ5Og4ey15TvTS XIQCjvthcIROIVP3sdYZNzA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOvGHL/dLqIEko15VM3eCGbjurIUWfw6wjXgmK+XRllFbX0OjTyzcaIccFUw979KzcsTh8+w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc08:: with SMTP id i8mr2324107wrr.82.1575971777315; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (prg-ext-pat.suse.com. [213.151.95.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u18sm2642900wrt.26.2019.12.10.01.56.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:56:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:56:15 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, memory_hotplug: Provide argument for the pgprot_t in arch_add_memory() Message-ID: <20191210095615.GB10404@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191209191346.5197-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20191209191346.5197-6-logang@deltatee.com> <20191209204128.GC7658@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon 09-12-19 14:24:22, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On 2019-12-09 1:41 p.m., Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 09-12-19 13:24:19, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2019-12-09 12:23 p.m., David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> On 09.12.19 20:13, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > >>>> devm_memremap_pages() is currently used by the PCI P2PDMA code to create > >>>> struct page mappings for IO memory. At present, these mappings are created > >>>> with PAGE_KERNEL which implies setting the PAT bits to be WB. However, on > >>>> x86, an mtrr register will typically override this and force the cache > >>>> type to be UC-. In the case firmware doesn't set this register it is > >>>> effectively WB and will typically result in a machine check exception > >>>> when it's accessed. > >>>> > >>>> Other arches are not currently likely to function correctly seeing they > >>>> don't have any MTRR registers to fall back on. > >>>> > >>>> To solve this, add an argument to arch_add_memory() to explicitly > >>>> set the pgprot value to a specific value. > >>>> > >>>> Of the arches that support MEMORY_HOTPLUG: x86_64, s390 and arm64 is a > >>>> simple change to pass the pgprot_t down to their respective functions > >>>> which set up the page tables. For x86_32, set the page tables explicitly > >>>> using _set_memory_prot() (seeing they are already mapped). For sh, reject > >>>> anything but PAGE_KERNEL settings -- this should be fine, for now, seeing > >>>> sh doesn't support ZONE_DEVICE anyway. > >>>> > >>>> Cc: Dan Williams > >>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand > >>>> Cc: Michal Hocko > >>>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe > >>>> --- > >>>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 4 ++-- > >>>> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 5 ++++- > >>>> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 4 ++-- > >>>> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 4 ++-- > >>>> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 5 ++++- > >>>> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 7 ++++++- > >>>> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 4 ++-- > >>>> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 2 +- > >>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +- > >>>> mm/memremap.c | 2 +- > >>>> 10 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > >>>> index 60c929f3683b..48b65272df15 100644 > >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > >>>> @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ int p4d_free_pud_page(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr) > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG > >>>> -int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, > >>>> +int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, pgprot_t prot, > >>>> struct mhp_restrictions *restrictions) > >>> > >>> Can we fiddle that into "struct mhp_restrictions" instead? > >> > >> Yes, if that's what people want, it's pretty trivial to do. I chose not > >> to do it that way because it doesn't get passed down to add_pages() and > >> it's not really a "restriction". If I don't hear any objections, I will > >> do that for v2. > > > > I do agree that restriction is not the best fit. But I consider prot > > argument to complicate the API to all users even though it is not really > > clear whether we are going to have many users really benefiting from it. > > Look at the vmalloc API and try to find how many users of __vmalloc do > > not use PAGE_KERNEL. > > > > So I can see two options. One of them is to add arch_add_memory_prot > > that would allow to have give and extra prot argument or simply call > > an arch independent API to change the protection after arch_add_memory. > > The later sounds like much less code. The memory shouldn't be in use by > > anybody at that stage yet AFAIU. Maybe there even is an API like that. > > Yes, well, we tried something like this by calling set_memory_wc() > inside memremap_pages(); but on large bars (tens of GB) it was too slow > (taking several seconds to complete) and on some hosts actually hit CPU > watchdog errors. Which looks like something to fix independently. > So at the very least we'd have to add some cpu_relax() calls to that > path. And it's also the case that set_memory_wc() is x86 only right now. > So we'd have to create a new general interface to walk and fixup page > tables for all arches. > > But, in my opinion, setting up all those page tables twice is too large > of an overhead and it's better to just add them correctly the first > time. The changes I propose to do this aren't really a lot of code and > probably less than creating a new interface for all arches. OK, fair enough. Then I would suggest going with arch_add_memory_prot then unless there is a wider disagreement witht that. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs