From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, jgross@suse.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/hotplug: Only respect mem= parameter during boot stage
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:34:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210093424.GL2984@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75188d0f-c609-5417-aa2e-354e76b7ba6e@gmail.com>
On 12/10/19 at 08:24pm, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/19 7:44 pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In commit 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem=
> > parameter") a global varialbe global max_mem_size is added to store
> typo ^^^
> > the value parsed from 'mem= ', then checked when memory region is
> > added. This truly stops those DIMM from being added into system memory
> > during boot-time.
> >
> > However, it also limits the later memory hotplug functionality. Any
> > memory board can't be hot added any more if its region is beyond the
> > max_mem_size. System will print error like below:
> >
> > [ 216.387164] acpi PNP0C80:02: add_memory failed
> > [ 216.389301] acpi PNP0C80:02: acpi_memory_enable_device() error
> > [ 216.392187] acpi PNP0C80:02: Enumeration failure
> >
> > From document of 'mem= ' parameter, it should be a restriction during
> > boot, but not impact the system memory adding/removing after booting.
> >
> > mem=nn[KMG] [KNL,BOOT] Force usage of a specific amount of memory
> > ...
> >
> > So fix it by also checking if it's during boot-time when restrict memory
> > adding. Otherwise, skip the restriction.
> >
>
> The fix looks reasonable, but I don't get the use case. Booting with mem= is
> generally a debug option, is this for debugging memory hotplug + limited memory?
Not really. My understanding is whether 'mem= ' is for debugging or not,
it should only take effect during boot-time. Even though people add
'mem= ' for debugging only, they will have to reboot if they want to do
futher testing, e.g memory hotplug, or any other feature which makes use
of the memory hotplug mechanism to implement their functionality, like
ballon, or pmem.
Thanks
Baoquan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 8:44 Baoquan He
2019-12-10 9:07 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-12-10 9:24 ` Balbir Singh
2019-12-10 9:34 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2019-12-10 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10 9:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10 9:41 ` Balbir Singh
2019-12-10 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 10:11 ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 10:21 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210093424.GL2984@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox