From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2884C43215 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804522089D for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:54:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 804522089D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 31C906B0304; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:54:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2CC6E6B0306; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:54:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1E2646B0307; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:54:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0047.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.47]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0889F6B0304 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:54:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 99A57180AD81C for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:54:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76179824070.02.story67_80bf152ce653 X-HE-Tag: story67_80bf152ce653 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3417 Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf37.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:54:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5FCAC46; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A11F1E47FC; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:54:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:54:11 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: John Hubbard Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Alex Williamson , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Daniel Vetter , Dave Chinner , David Airlie , "David S . Miller" , Ira Weiny , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Jonathan Corbet , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Magnus Karlsson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Michael Ellerman , Michal Hocko , Mike Kravetz , Paul Mackerras , Shuah Khan , Vlastimil Babka , bpf@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/24] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines Message-ID: <20191121095411.GC18190@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121071354.456618-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121080356.GA24784@lst.de> <852f6c27-8b65-547b-89e0-e8f32a4d17b9@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <852f6c27-8b65-547b-89e0-e8f32a4d17b9@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 21-11-19 00:29:59, John Hubbard wrote: > > > > Otherwise this looks fine and might be a worthwhile cleanup to feed > > Andrew for 5.5 independent of the gut of the changes. > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > Thanks for the reviews! Say, it sounds like your view here is that this > series should be targeted at 5.6 (not 5.5), is that what you have in mind? > And get the preparatory patches (1-9, and maybe even 10-16) into 5.5? One more note :) If you are going to push pin_user_pages() interfaces (which I'm fine with), it would probably make sense to push also the put_user_pages() -> unpin_user_pages() renaming so that that inconsistency in naming does not exist in the released upstream kernel. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR