From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:40:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114194044.GC24848@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com>
On Thu 14-11-19 14:19:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0.
> Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages().
>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
yay again! I have to say that this was a head scratcher when I've seen
that for the first time. It is really great to see it go
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> include/linux/page-isolation.h | 4 ++--
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> index 6861df759fad..148e65a9c606 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype)
> #define MEMORY_OFFLINE 0x1
> #define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2
>
> -bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> - int migratetype, int flags);
> +bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
> + int flags);
> void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype);
> int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> int migratetype, int *num_movable);
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 3b5cee4d3f4e..f06d33748607 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(unsigned long pfn)
> if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
> return false;
>
> - return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
> + return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
> MEMORY_OFFLINE);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f5ecbacb0e04..e4d8f3a1a6b6 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -8270,17 +8270,15 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
>
> /*
> * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not.
> - * If @count is not zero, it is okay to include less @count unmovable pages
> *
> * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that
> * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable
> * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at
> * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
> */
> -bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> - int migratetype, int flags)
> +bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
> + int flags)
> {
> - unsigned long found;
> unsigned long iter = 0;
> unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> const char *reason = "unmovable page";
> @@ -8306,13 +8304,11 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> goto unmovable;
> }
>
> - for (found = 0; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
> - unsigned long check = pfn + iter;
> -
> - if (!pfn_valid_within(check))
> + for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
> + if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn + iter))
> continue;
>
> - page = pfn_to_page(check);
> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
>
> if (PageReserved(page))
> goto unmovable;
> @@ -8361,11 +8357,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page))
> continue;
>
> - if (__PageMovable(page))
> + if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page))
> continue;
>
> - if (!PageLRU(page))
> - found++;
> /*
> * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
> * it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
> @@ -8379,8 +8373,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> * is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel
> * page at boot.
> */
> - if (found > count)
> - goto unmovable;
> + goto unmovable;
> }
> return false;
> unmovable:
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index 21af88b718aa..1f8b9dfecbe8 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_
> * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself.
> * We just check MOVABLE pages.
> */
> - if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
> + if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
> unsigned long nr_pages;
> int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
>
> --
> 2.21.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-14 13:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: remove the memory isolate notifier David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 19:39 ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-15 3:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-14 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages() David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 19:40 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-11-15 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: remove the memory isolate notifier David Hildenbrand
2019-12-02 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-09 11:15 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191114194044.GC24848@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox