From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Geoffray <ngeoffray@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memfd: Fix COW issue on MAP_PRIVATE and F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE mappings
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:25:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191107192528.0c22e8e122a04d4f8d29c5eb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108020614.GA99567@google.com>
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:06:14 -0500 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:00:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:53:54 -0500 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> >
> > > F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE has unexpected behavior when used with MAP_PRIVATE:
> > > A private mapping created after the memfd file that gets sealed with
> > > F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE loses the copy-on-write at fork behavior, meaning
> > > children and parent share the same memory, even though the mapping is
> > > private.
> >
> > That sounds fairly serious. Should this be backported into -stable kernels?
>
> Yes, it should be.
I added
Fixes: ab3948f58ff84 ("mm/memfd: add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> The F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE feature was introduced in v5.1 so
> v5.3.x stable kernels would need a backport. I can submit a backport tomorrow
> unless we are Ok with stable automatically picking it up (I believe the
> stable folks "auto select" fixes which should detect this is a fix since I
> have said it is a fix in the subject line).
The Cc:stable tag should trigger the appropriate actions, assisted by
the Fixes:. I doubt if "fix" in the Subject has much effect.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 19:53 Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-11-07 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] memfd: Add test for COW " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-11-08 1:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] memfd: Fix COW issue " Andrew Morton
2019-11-08 2:06 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-11-08 3:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-11-08 6:37 ` Greg KH
2019-11-08 15:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-11-08 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08 15:35 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191107192528.0c22e8e122a04d4f8d29c5eb@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ngeoffray@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox