From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925FACA9ED3 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474682080F for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="nB5dVG7V" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 474682080F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A16316B0005; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:20:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9C6796B0006; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:20:06 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8DD496B0007; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:20:06 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0171.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787BD6B0005 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:20:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 415FB4DA6 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:06 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76120165212.07.brake40_5825f2be9ee32 X-HE-Tag: brake40_5825f2be9ee32 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 9475 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com (userp2130.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by imf37.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA4NJY8u071789; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=1cx1RbADQKDZqG/g3NhoeTvntNZxR921bxJ3a014JHg=; b=nB5dVG7Vclcs8O5OgoIdXggoGJG/i3PX3ipv8Fyk9hXLk9w3PWbRBzHI5Tas28pCfUxf Ug/I7XgMjHzpvFwY7HrnVzvcd4REHgbtWcidoIENsrI603W55yVlD/Jud8e8jssdfl2F 7fmgOMjal37HSevFbhv698SSmmS049qi9l092WPEgz4H+W3rp4cxBiNyvDMk2hPWOCS1 y1/j35DiKLQ7gCeCxo8uVK+eJc9Aj0ldcGlxV9R9xSDr2h6QaaJc746TmFckpK+qc+rz Ex7xV64x3I856JJRg/jk9M7o7CVoebfueeGKS5jIkntM9IMdpiEtf++BHHWouOCA4t2Q ig== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2w117ttpkx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:20:03 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA4NJ5lT069076; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:03 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2w1k8vpqgw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:20:02 +0000 Received: from abhmp0004.oracle.com (abhmp0004.oracle.com [141.146.116.10]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id xA4NK1YC019709; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:20:01 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 15:20:01 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:20:00 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/28] xfs: factor inode lookup from xfs_ifree_cluster Message-ID: <20191104232000.GR4153244@magnolia> References: <20191031234618.15403-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20191031234618.15403-9-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191031234618.15403-9-david@fromorbit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9431 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=2 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040221 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9431 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040222 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:45:58AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > There's lots of indent in this code which makes it a bit hard to > follow. We are also going to completely rework the inode lookup code > as part of the inode reclaim rework, so factor out the inode lookup > code from the inode cluster freeing code. > > Based on prototype code from Christoph Hellwig. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Seems pretty straightforward, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > index e9e4f444f8ce..33edb18098ca 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > @@ -2516,6 +2516,88 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove( > return error; > } > > +/* > + * Look up the inode number specified and mark it stale if it is found. If it is > + * dirty, return the inode so it can be attached to the cluster buffer so it can > + * be processed appropriately when the cluster free transaction completes. > + */ > +static struct xfs_inode * > +xfs_ifree_get_one_inode( > + struct xfs_perag *pag, > + struct xfs_inode *free_ip, > + int inum) > +{ > + struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; > + struct xfs_inode *ip; > + > +retry: > + rcu_read_lock(); > + ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, inum)); > + > + /* Inode not in memory, nothing to do */ > + if (!ip) > + goto out_rcu_unlock; > + > + /* > + * because this is an RCU protected lookup, we could find a recently > + * freed or even reallocated inode during the lookup. We need to check > + * under the i_flags_lock for a valid inode here. Skip it if it is not > + * valid, the wrong inode or stale. > + */ > + spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock); > + if (ip->i_ino != inum || __xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) { > + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock); > + goto out_rcu_unlock; > + } > + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock); > + > + /* > + * Don't try to lock/unlock the current inode, but we _cannot_ skip the > + * other inodes that we did not find in the list attached to the buffer > + * and are not already marked stale. If we can't lock it, back off and > + * retry. > + */ > + if (ip != free_ip) { > + if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + delay(1); > + goto retry; > + } > + > + /* > + * Check the inode number again in case we're racing with > + * freeing in xfs_reclaim_inode(). See the comments in that > + * function for more information as to why the initial check is > + * not sufficient. > + */ > + if (ip->i_ino != inum) { > + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > + goto out_rcu_unlock; > + } > + } > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + > + xfs_iflock(ip); > + xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_ISTALE); > + > + /* > + * We don't need to attach clean inodes or those only with unlogged > + * changes (which we throw away, anyway). > + */ > + if (!ip->i_itemp || xfs_inode_clean(ip)) { > + ASSERT(ip != free_ip); > + xfs_ifunlock(ip); > + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > + goto out_no_inode; > + } > + return ip; > + > +out_rcu_unlock: > + rcu_read_unlock(); > +out_no_inode: > + return NULL; > +} > + > /* > * A big issue when freeing the inode cluster is that we _cannot_ skip any > * inodes that are in memory - they all must be marked stale and attached to > @@ -2616,77 +2698,11 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( > * even trying to lock them. > */ > for (i = 0; i < igeo->inodes_per_cluster; i++) { > -retry: > - rcu_read_lock(); > - ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root, > - XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, (inum + i))); > - > - /* Inode not in memory, nothing to do */ > - if (!ip) { > - rcu_read_unlock(); > + ip = xfs_ifree_get_one_inode(pag, free_ip, inum + i); > + if (!ip) > continue; > - } > - > - /* > - * because this is an RCU protected lookup, we could > - * find a recently freed or even reallocated inode > - * during the lookup. We need to check under the > - * i_flags_lock for a valid inode here. Skip it if it > - * is not valid, the wrong inode or stale. > - */ > - spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock); > - if (ip->i_ino != inum + i || > - __xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) { > - spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock); > - rcu_read_unlock(); > - continue; > - } > - spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock); > - > - /* > - * Don't try to lock/unlock the current inode, but we > - * _cannot_ skip the other inodes that we did not find > - * in the list attached to the buffer and are not > - * already marked stale. If we can't lock it, back off > - * and retry. > - */ > - if (ip != free_ip) { > - if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) { > - rcu_read_unlock(); > - delay(1); > - goto retry; > - } > - > - /* > - * Check the inode number again in case we're > - * racing with freeing in xfs_reclaim_inode(). > - * See the comments in that function for more > - * information as to why the initial check is > - * not sufficient. > - */ > - if (ip->i_ino != inum + i) { > - xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > - rcu_read_unlock(); > - continue; > - } > - } > - rcu_read_unlock(); > > - xfs_iflock(ip); > - xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_ISTALE); > - > - /* > - * we don't need to attach clean inodes or those only > - * with unlogged changes (which we throw away, anyway). > - */ > iip = ip->i_itemp; > - if (!iip || xfs_inode_clean(ip)) { > - ASSERT(ip != free_ip); > - xfs_ifunlock(ip); > - xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > - continue; > - } > - > iip->ili_last_fields = iip->ili_fields; > iip->ili_fields = 0; > iip->ili_fsync_fields = 0; > -- > 2.24.0.rc0 >