From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, meminit: Recalculate pcpu batch and high limits after init completes
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:09:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018140959.GK3321@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018130127.GP5017@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 03:01:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 18-10-19 11:56:05, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Deferred memory initialisation updates zone->managed_pages during
> > the initialisation phase but before that finishes, the per-cpu page
> > allocator (pcpu) calculates the number of pages allocated/freed in
> > batches as well as the maximum number of pages allowed on a per-cpu list.
> > As zone->managed_pages is not up to date yet, the pcpu initialisation
> > calculates inappropriately low batch and high values.
> >
> > This increases zone lock contention quite severely in some cases with the
> > degree of severity depending on how many CPUs share a local zone and the
> > size of the zone. A private report indicated that kernel build times were
> > excessive with extremely high system CPU usage. A perf profile indicated
> > that a large chunk of time was lost on zone->lock contention.
> >
> > This patch recalculates the pcpu batch and high values after deferred
> > initialisation completes on each node. It was tested on a 2-socket AMD
> > EPYC 2 machine using a kernel compilation workload -- allmodconfig and
> > all available CPUs.
> >
> > mmtests configuration: config-workload-kernbench-max
> > Configuration was modified to build on a fresh XFS partition.
> >
> > kernbench
> > 5.4.0-rc3 5.4.0-rc3
> > vanilla resetpcpu-v1r1
> > Amean user-256 13249.50 ( 0.00%) 15928.40 * -20.22%*
> > Amean syst-256 14760.30 ( 0.00%) 4551.77 * 69.16%*
> > Amean elsp-256 162.42 ( 0.00%) 118.46 * 27.06%*
> > Stddev user-256 42.97 ( 0.00%) 50.83 ( -18.30%)
> > Stddev syst-256 336.87 ( 0.00%) 33.70 ( 90.00%)
> > Stddev elsp-256 2.46 ( 0.00%) 0.81 ( 67.01%)
> >
> > 5.4.0-rc3 5.4.0-rc3
> > vanillaresetpcpu-v1r1
> > Duration User 39766.24 47802.92
> > Duration System 44298.10 13671.93
> > Duration Elapsed 519.11 387.65
> >
> > The patch reduces system CPU usage by 69.16% and total build time by
> > 27.06%. The variance of system CPU usage is also much reduced.
>
> The fix makes sense. It would be nice to see the difference in the batch
> sizes from the initial setup compared to the one after the deferred
> intialization is done
>
Before, this was the breakdown of batch and high values over all zones
were
256 batch: 1
256 batch: 63
512 batch: 7
256 high: 0
256 high: 378
512 high: 42
i.e. 512 pcpu pagesets had a batch limit of 7 and a high limit of 42.
These were for the NORMAL zones on the system. After the patch
256 batch: 1
768 batch: 63
256 high: 0
768 high: 378
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15+
>
> Hmm, are you sure about 4.15? Doesn't this go all the way down to
> deferred initialization? I do not see any recent changes on when
> setup_per_cpu_pageset is called.
>
No, I'm not 100% sure. It looks like this was always an issue from the
code but did not happen on at least one 4.12-based distribution kernel for
reasons that are non-obvious. Either way, the tag should have been "v4.1+"
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 10:56 [PATCH 0/3] Recalculate per-cpu page allocator batch and high limits after deferred meminit Mel Gorman
2019-10-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, pcp: Share common code between memory hotplug and percpu sysctl handler Mel Gorman
2019-10-18 11:57 ` Matt Fleming
2019-10-18 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, meminit: Recalculate pcpu batch and high limits after init completes Mel Gorman
2019-10-18 11:57 ` Matt Fleming
2019-10-18 13:01 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 14:09 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2019-10-19 1:40 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-20 9:32 ` Mel Gorman
2019-10-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, pcpu: Make zone pcp updates and reset internal to the mm Mel Gorman
2019-10-18 11:57 ` Matt Fleming
2019-10-18 13:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 11:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] Recalculate per-cpu page allocator batch and high limits after deferred meminit Matt Fleming
2019-10-18 12:54 ` Mel Gorman
2019-10-18 14:48 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191018140959.GK3321@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox