From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Felix.Kuehling@amd.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH hmm 03/15] mm/hmm: allow hmm_range to be used with a mmu_range_notifier or hmm_mirror
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:12:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015181242.8343-4-jgg@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191015181242.8343-1-jgg@ziepe.ca>
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
hmm_mirror's handling of ranges does not use a sequence count which
results in this bug:
CPU0 CPU1
hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range)
valid == true
hmm_range_fault(range)
hmm_invalidate_range_start()
range->valid = false
hmm_invalidate_range_end()
range->valid = true
hmm_range_valid(range)
valid == true
Where the hmm_range_valid should not have succeeded.
Adding the required sequence count would make it nearly identical to the
new mmu_range_notifier. Instead replace the hmm_mirror stuff with
mmu_range_notifier.
Co-existence of the two APIs is the first step.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
---
include/linux/hmm.h | 5 +++++
mm/hmm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 3fec513b9c00f1..8ac1fd6a81af8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -145,6 +145,9 @@ enum hmm_pfn_value_e {
/*
* struct hmm_range - track invalidation lock on virtual address range
*
+ * @notifier: an optional mmu_range_notifier
+ * @notifier_seq: when notifier is used this is the result of
+ * mmu_range_read_begin()
* @hmm: the core HMM structure this range is active against
* @vma: the vm area struct for the range
* @list: all range lock are on a list
@@ -159,6 +162,8 @@ enum hmm_pfn_value_e {
* @valid: pfns array did not change since it has been fill by an HMM function
*/
struct hmm_range {
+ struct mmu_range_notifier *notifier;
+ unsigned long notifier_seq;
struct hmm *hmm;
struct list_head list;
unsigned long start;
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 902f5fa6bf93ad..22ac3595771feb 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -852,6 +852,14 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_unregister);
+static bool needs_retry(struct hmm_range *range)
+{
+ if (range->notifier)
+ return mmu_range_check_retry(range->notifier,
+ range->notifier_seq);
+ return !range->valid;
+}
+
static const struct mm_walk_ops hmm_walk_ops = {
.pud_entry = hmm_vma_walk_pud,
.pmd_entry = hmm_vma_walk_pmd,
@@ -892,18 +900,23 @@ long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, unsigned int flags)
const unsigned long device_vma = VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP;
unsigned long start = range->start, end;
struct hmm_vma_walk hmm_vma_walk;
- struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&hmm->mmu_notifier.mm->mmap_sem);
+ if (range->notifier)
+ mm = range->notifier->mm;
+ else
+ mm = range->hmm->mmu_notifier.mm;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&mm->mmap_sem);
do {
/* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
- if (!range->valid)
+ if (needs_retry(range))
return -EBUSY;
- vma = find_vma(hmm->mmu_notifier.mm, start);
+ vma = find_vma(mm, start);
if (vma == NULL || (vma->vm_flags & device_vma))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -933,7 +946,7 @@ long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, unsigned int flags)
start = hmm_vma_walk.last;
/* Keep trying while the range is valid. */
- } while (ret == -EBUSY && range->valid);
+ } while (ret == -EBUSY && !needs_retry(range));
if (ret) {
unsigned long i;
@@ -991,7 +1004,7 @@ long hmm_range_dma_map(struct hmm_range *range, struct device *device,
continue;
/* Check if range is being invalidated */
- if (!range->valid) {
+ if (needs_retry(range)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto unmap;
}
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-15 18:12 [PATCH hmm 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 01/15] mm/mmu_notifier: define the header pre-processor parts even if disabled Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 18:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 02/15] mm/mmu_notifier: add an interval tree notifier Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 18:30 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-21 18:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 19:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-21 19:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 19:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-27 23:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-21 18:33 ` [PATCH hmm 03/15] mm/hmm: allow hmm_range to be used with a mmu_range_notifier or hmm_mirror Jerome Glisse
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 04/15] mm/hmm: define the pre-processor related parts of hmm.h even if disabled Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 18:31 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 05/15] RDMA/odp: Use mmu_range_notifier_insert() Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-04 20:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 06/15] RDMA/hfi1: Use mmu_range_notifier_inset for user_exp_rcv Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29 12:15 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 07/15] drm/radeon: use mmu_range_notifier_insert Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 08/15] xen/gntdev: Use select for DMA_SHARED_BUFFER Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-16 5:11 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-16 6:35 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-10-21 19:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 6:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 09/15] xen/gntdev: use mmu_range_notifier_insert Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 10/15] nouveau: use mmu_notifier directly for invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 11/15] nouveau: use mmu_range_notifier instead of hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 13/15] drm/amdgpu: Use mmu_range_insert " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 14/15] drm/amdgpu: Use mmu_range_notifier " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-15 18:12 ` [PATCH hmm 15/15] mm/hmm: remove hmm_mirror and related Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 18:38 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-21 18:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 19:19 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-16 8:58 ` [PATCH hmm 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking Christian König
2019-10-16 16:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-17 8:54 ` Christian König
2019-10-17 16:26 ` Yang, Philip
2019-10-17 16:47 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-18 20:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-20 14:21 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-21 13:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 14:28 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-21 15:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-22 7:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-10-22 15:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 9:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-10-23 9:32 ` Christian König
2019-10-23 16:52 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-23 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 2:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-21 15:55 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-10-21 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-22 11:56 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-10-22 14:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 18:40 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-21 19:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:26 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191015181242.8343-4-jgg@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox