From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
jglisse@redhat.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, riel@surriel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap.c: reuse mergeable anon_vma as parent when fork
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 06:38:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004223822.GB32588@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5a8b1ba-c698-257f-854b-33f4fd922091@yandex-team.ru>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 07:33:53PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>On 04/10/2019 19.06, Wei Yang wrote:
>> In function __anon_vma_prepare(), we will try to find anon_vma if it is
>> possible to reuse it. While on fork, the logic is different.
>>
>> Since commit 5beb49305251 ("mm: change anon_vma linking to fix
>> multi-process server scalability issue"), function anon_vma_clone()
>> tries to allocate new anon_vma for child process. But the logic here
>> will allocate a new anon_vma for each vma, even in parent this vma
>> is mergeable and share the same anon_vma with its sibling. This may do
>> better for scalability issue, while it is not necessary to do so
>> especially after interval tree is used.
>>
>> Commit 7a3ef208e662 ("mm: prevent endless growth of anon_vma hierarchy")
>> tries to reuse some anon_vma by counting child anon_vma and attached
>> vmas. While for those mergeable anon_vmas, we can just reuse it and not
>> necessary to go through the logic.
>>
>> After this change, kernel build test reduces 20% anon_vma allocation.
>>
>
>Makes sense. This might have much bigger effect for scenarios when task
>unmaps holes in huge vma as red-zones between allocations and then forks.
>
>Acked-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
>
Thanks
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 16:06 Wei Yang
2019-10-04 16:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-04 22:33 ` Wei Yang
2019-10-04 23:48 ` Wei Yang
2019-10-05 1:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-05 12:35 ` Wei Yang
2019-10-04 16:33 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-04 22:38 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2019-10-04 23:45 ` Rik van Riel
2019-10-04 23:49 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191004223822.GB32588@richard \
--to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox