From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ABBC47E48 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D69521A4A for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="V6fllti1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D69521A4A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shutemov.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id ED01E6B000D; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E58F36B000E; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:25:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CF9E66B0266; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:25:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0108.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.108]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5206B000D for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B242180AD802 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:25:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75976691196.10.drug47_512c159fe3024 X-HE-Tag: drug47_512c159fe3024 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5635 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com (mail-ed1-f66.google.com [209.85.208.66]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id h2so1489597edn.3 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:25:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sZySFJLySHqAg+L9VV4WCP/n21XzxDuSfHpOa9dXZmk=; b=V6fllti1rZHNM40XpXtG1W2Ot4VDBW2UHagEWW0u0MoI0rDFExg7qiEEC4Kx0BkJUO N39Zd2scOCpcawHLCt9EgBnxj3aafD0HolLGIy87seuTK4yUMVbDI6o0IMeV8c8kl2q3 Wf5SnYx+eKbP+/RCIcXsFXduLye95DPO+JQHh/WCLvCUGlPh8nGmH+sogm+pvP4xBNfx h4JNIqEgrzXC8r7pu68KwoXWKMGCd2MHljTYxWD05iLCWWxyObBk3ZBW/VCrlMrvtx7F z59l19lWm8GhC67PPTck26crrkv0RUiagsUS97uZ2h069vyeKg0ny5eU8/EERwCbbDGs R3hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sZySFJLySHqAg+L9VV4WCP/n21XzxDuSfHpOa9dXZmk=; b=VknRlDjZQvuqMtF6USsWSWsPRAvaMaqaIpsZ0yOg/ddFpLZrgmXf6qJb3My/A1HjSw q0nsg/SskDHfxXaz0fUjzcLJyvMmuQfyc03H+VQqHicaVRG+OxKmE4dvnTyKzKP5q0u1 LfvfxF0wzUpubSof+15XZpDLB2R0jjH4uWGWbX/+xiPQ3KFtBZVaa5zsoV3l4l7hCf7M 0SeREvIWvBcctIskD8bZkeS0lY4GAb257n0+kE5wcg90spRmm7qK/BTUL87/2IQRaXTm xjlwUGKJ+TLzKGi6hHnUu8g+KWXntGv6yOxmqvvabMgCFNvsmB8deyOxmPaQFsemwwGI Dblw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVq9oIi9qTTN4UMhCDURCsbs1tvKggk4YABqz17gXVpDSbJtGy+ vhWNRFdYKm5RpwePPxa96po/PXjr3Z9J4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqys0ai/BvbbRaO+GKiiNYldqfE2MTNlpzGoSrB2YWZd0rbFIaSycO3c42IMKl9185PoXnzMPg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:cfc7:: with SMTP id i7mr2606367edk.89.1569493556435; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ng5sm187555ejb.9.2019.09.26.03.25.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7FBCC1004E0; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:25:58 +0300 (+03) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:25:58 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Jia He Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Marc Zyngier , Matthew Wilcox , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Suzuki Poulose , Punit Agrawal , Anshuman Khandual , Alex Van Brunt , Robin Murphy , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Ralph Campbell , hejianet@gmail.com, Kaly Xin , nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] mm: fix double page fault on arm64 if PTE_AF is cleared Message-ID: <20190926102558.jlessqelf5k3havb@box> References: <20190925025922.176362-1-justin.he@arm.com> <20190925025922.176362-4-justin.he@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190925025922.176362-4-justin.he@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:59:22AM +0800, Jia He wrote: > When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST1 in arm64 guest, there > will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page. > > Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose > [ 110.016195] Call trace: > [ 110.016826] do_page_fault+0x5a4/0x690 > [ 110.017812] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 > [ 110.018726] el1_da+0x20/0xc4 > [ 110.019492] __arch_copy_from_user+0x180/0x280 > [ 110.020646] do_wp_page+0xb0/0x860 > [ 110.021517] __handle_mm_fault+0x994/0x1338 > [ 110.022606] handle_mm_fault+0xe8/0x180 > [ 110.023584] do_page_fault+0x240/0x690 > [ 110.024535] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 > [ 110.025423] el0_da+0x20/0x24 > > The pte info before __copy_from_user_inatomic is (PTE_AF is cleared): > [ffff9b007000] pgd=000000023d4f8003, pud=000000023da9b003, pmd=000000023d4b3003, pte=360000298607bd3 > > As told by Catalin: "On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying from > user will fail because the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we > always end up with zeroed page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. we > don't always have a hardware-managed access flag on arm64." > > This patch fix it by calling pte_mkyoung. Also, the parameter is > changed because vmf should be passed to cow_user_page() > > Add a WARN_ON_ONCE when __copy_from_user_inatomic() returns error > in case there can be some obscure use-case.(by Kirill) > > [1] https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/tree/master/src/test/vmmalloc_fork > > Signed-off-by: Jia He > Reported-by: Yibo Cai Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov -- Kirill A. Shutemov