From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Export generic_online_page()
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:15:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923111559.GK6016@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df15f269-48df-8738-c714-9fae3cb3b44c@redhat.com>
On Mon 23-09-19 11:31:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.19 10:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-09-19 10:17:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits()"
> >>>
> >>> Let's replace the __online_page...() functions by generic_online_page().
> >>> Hyper-V only wants to delay the actual onlining of un-backed pages, so we
> >>> can simpy re-use the generic function.
> >>>
> >>> Only compile-tested.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> David Hildenbrand (3):
> >>> mm/memory_hotplug: Export generic_online_page()
> >>> hv_balloon: Use generic_online_page()
> >>> mm/memory_hotplug: Remove __online_page_free() and
> >>> __online_page_increment_counters()
> >>>
> >>> drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 3 +--
> >>> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 4 +---
> >>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 17 ++---------------
> >>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ping, any comments on this one?
> >
> > Unification makes a lot of sense to me. You can add
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> >
> > I will most likely won't surprise if I asked for more here though ;)
>
> I'm not surprised, but definitely not in a negative sense ;) I was
> asking myself if we could somehow rework this, too.
>
> > I have to confess I really detest the whole concept of a hidden callback
> > with a very weird API. Is this something we can do about? I do realize
> > that adding a callback would require either cluttering the existing APIs
> > but maybe we can come up with something more clever. Or maybe existing
> > external users of online callback can do that as a separate step after
> > the online is completed - or is this impossible due to locking
> > guarantees?
> >
>
> The use case of this (somewhat special) callback really is to avoid
> selected (unbacked in the hypervisor) pages to get put to the buddy just
> now, but instead to defer that (sometimes, defer till infinity ;) ).
> Especially, to hinder these pages from getting touched at all. Pages
> that won't be put to the buddy will usually get PG_offline set (e.g.,
> Hyper-V and XEN) - the only two users I am aware of.
>
> For Hyper-V (and also eventually virtio-mem), it is important to set
> PG_offline before marking the section to be online (SECTION_IS_ONLINE).
> Only this way, PG_offline is properly set on all pfn_to_online_page()
> pages, meaning "don't touch this page" - e.g., used to skip over such
> pages when suspending or by makedumpfile to skip over such offline pages
> when creating a memory dump.
Thanks for the clarification. I have never really studied what those
callbacks are doing really.
> So if we would e.g., try to piggy-back onto the memory_notify()
> infrastructure, we could
> 1. Online all pages to the buddy (dropping the callback)
> 2. E.g., memory_notify(MEM_ONLINE_PAGES, &arg);
> -> in the notifier, pull pages from the buddy, mark sections online
> 3. Set all involved sections online (online_mem_sections())
This doesn't really sound any better. For one pages are immediately
usable when they hit the buddy allocator so this is racy and thus not
reliable.
> However, I am not sure what actually happens after 1. - we are only
> holding the device hotplug lock and the memory hotplug lock, so the
> pages can just get allocated. Also, it sounds like more work and code
> for the same end result (okay, if the rework is really necessary, though).
>
> So yeah, while the current callback might not be optimal, I don't see an
> easy and clean way to rework this. With the change in this series we are
> at least able to simply defer doing what would have been done without
> the callback - not perfect but better.
>
> Do you have anything in mind that could work out and make this nicer?
I am wondering why those pages get onlined when they are, in fact,
supposed to be offline.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-23 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-09 11:48 David Hildenbrand
2019-09-09 11:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] " David Hildenbrand
2019-09-09 11:48 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] hv_balloon: Use generic_online_page() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-09 11:48 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove __online_page_free() and __online_page_increment_counters() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Export generic_online_page() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 8:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-23 9:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 11:15 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-09-23 11:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 11:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-23 12:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-23 12:34 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190923111559.GK6016@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox