From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A0FC3A5A4 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368482343B for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="2d7DVqD9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 368482343B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9DA136B0006; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 963286B0008; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 802AE6B000A; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.89]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589D56B0006 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 03882181AC9AE for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:50:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75880286580.02.ring86_1e84224abf822 X-HE-Tag: ring86_1e84224abf822 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3067 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 258C123439; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:50:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567198208; bh=+F7ljiSg6p5FWNKeDI6T/1PPD+xSpDlAYKC1QB46hI0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=2d7DVqD9TskavURNZTbEB1iY1v0A5qusBehdR9V9DI2GTRw1T9+qOWAhs5lRRkDuN 8/s1Z64FbnjVvdSZO8S7ndWxbXSBfupq+SQ6/57SQ3/F0j/M8ygAy0TvGdy81uPh41 LrAPQ5tECRaUSOjvulcECL1rd1t31LTP5Fk6pAOg= Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:50:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Austin Kim Cc: urezki@gmail.com, guro@fb.com, rpenyaev@suse.de, mhocko@suse.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: move 'area->pages' after if statement Message-Id: <20190830135007.8b5949bd57975d687ff0a3f8@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190830035716.GA190684@LGEARND20B15> References: <20190830035716.GA190684@LGEARND20B15> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:57:16 +0900 Austin Kim wrote: > If !area->pages statement is true where memory allocation fails, > area is freed. > > In this case 'area->pages = pages' should not executed. > So move 'area->pages = pages' after if statement. > > ... > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -2416,13 +2416,15 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask, > } else { > pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, nested_gfp, node); > } > - area->pages = pages; > - if (!area->pages) { > + > + if (!pages) { > remove_vm_area(area->addr); > kfree(area); > return NULL; > } > > + area->pages = pages; > + > for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) { > struct page *page; > Fair enough. But we can/should also do this? --- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-move-area-pages-after-if-statement-fix +++ a/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2409,7 +2409,6 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct nr_pages = get_vm_area_size(area) >> PAGE_SHIFT; array_size = (nr_pages * sizeof(struct page *)); - area->nr_pages = nr_pages; /* Please note that the recursion is strictly bounded. */ if (array_size > PAGE_SIZE) { pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, nested_gfp|highmem_mask, @@ -2425,6 +2424,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct } area->pages = pages; + area->nr_pages = nr_pages; for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) { struct page *page; _