From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C86FC3A5A6 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3633D2064A for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="S5udK1mC" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3633D2064A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A2DE16B0006; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:22:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9DF856B0008; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:22:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8CE8A6B000A; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:22:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0153.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.153]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED806B0006 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:22:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EE1362CE for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:22:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75869632524.27.cloth48_4ed7fd909cd3c X-HE-Tag: cloth48_4ed7fd909cd3c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4792 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com (mail-qt1-f193.google.com [209.85.160.193]) by imf48.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id b11so709401qtp.10 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O/Eb9Yv9aHdMVq7eZpOlz+xzQGez6PZaf9uMsvKFVSk=; b=S5udK1mCM17tEnM8qe/Euf0h6hUrQ+FsIrJswR0TUa9fPCRYoUQo2Bj0vFq0Fv5x7W brf7rtaaLWpCWBBcKPEArqo55P7LK9Y+3eaAJqaKFm9q2TqOIryQNcOTxeO43ahRyXMz +78BCiCK8tOS1KfOCv/vOzajMjclnKu+sqNB45ittMbYMfVVgnS3nM2+4LsDNk/3U5wE KGi8UiI7+GqWkinARDlIKI/eUAIOW3lDoAfSJWFqbiG0llZz8rTszgW14HlsyNgX7pzb W7N9EDComqNskKX+zkqao8RVYlPByzJ2Rr93KmNG9Ioy0A2C6bMSUxiivkfsaaJUAjXo HBtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O/Eb9Yv9aHdMVq7eZpOlz+xzQGez6PZaf9uMsvKFVSk=; b=gjFxI78UVAmMd8crXrX/vsC8LRR8fk+j3MHWZ0OewFeTm2VpMnNQIl6B60EgzmMaIE Vwnq1XlkZziFxUyVyy9nfLP1TyfbQnVxAOHy60m6gGZUE6fbnYvEsUcfSrsfHTpLXYY5 OdhVv41S3eP8PixZ3t0cTHmeesFh4ucsU+AP6MRrpCahGZf9nOmgcw74CqKQdp1laL7g mSvhl2te/Tgb9I0jN7PIUGotUbEdO8dVhI0cDpP5HzOj+iN6TKqyUtfrcDpKM5CA7aoS fawOS83RiHR13KCy3s6+FbbaBb2SDGa1VSSqVSCJJ5+fk2peo7UOrk5Oop+REkcNl5pF KqBg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWghdvs0r8oiRi0PCxSpG//yOszWy7N6DtNtbEWxDZM2bv7oxdM j5zjl8Gt74pENK2+QtLqVUXx5A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyjufzPEUsNxQkLMwFYT3vRSJjpNbEwwYE37k3KlJ9jZ4hz+iVzDJ0578B4zjHZuy1e3Jd+Ag== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:47c3:: with SMTP id p3mr808533qvw.120.1566944540997; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-167-216-168.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.167.216.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y25sm408767qkj.35.2019.08.27.15.22.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2jr1-00080x-Hu; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:22:19 -0300 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:22:19 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Ralph Campbell Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() infinite loop Message-ID: <20190827222219.GA30700@ziepe.ca> References: <20190823221753.2514-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com> <20190823221753.2514-3-rcampbell@nvidia.com> <20190827184157.GA24929@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 01:16:13PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > > On 8/27/19 11:41 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:53PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell > > > mm/hmm.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c > > > index 29371485fe94..4882b83aeccb 100644 > > > +++ b/mm/hmm.c > > > @@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_hole_(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > > > hmm_vma_walk->last = addr; > > > i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > > > + if (write_fault && walk->vma && !(walk->vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) > > > + return -EPERM; > > > > Can walk->vma be NULL here? hmm_vma_do_fault() touches it > > unconditionally. > > > > Jason > > > walk->vma can be NULL. hmm_vma_do_fault() no longer touches it > unconditionally, that is what the preceding patch fixes. > I suppose I could change hmm_vma_walk_hole_() to check for NULL > and fill in the pfns[] array, I just chose to handle it in > hmm_vma_do_fault(). Okay, yes maybe long term it would be clearer to do the vma null check closer to the start of the callback, but this is a good enough bug fix Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Jason