From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640A9C3A5A4 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 19:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC272146E for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 19:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="xop1Vb8o" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0AC272146E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6F0DC6B04E5; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 69FBC6B04E7; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:57:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 58F176B04E8; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:57:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0136.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.136]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2586B04E5 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E510C3CF9 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 19:57:52 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75858381984.15.room47_61dd1d759c24f X-HE-Tag: room47_61dd1d759c24f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2674 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf46.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 19:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D27962082E; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 19:57:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566676671; bh=MarEzIq7oHZK8s3g0cjP9atdboVj3SRVugsL5q1dspM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xop1Vb8otLQ94HJ3aLg5YMDZc4cHNe23khfk5bWHO7WxQXhU3bXn9Tu/kTumbnWyv GTFo16QqVwqvgVc2DG6/bsuH6Onrm/3Rs6XxCg0K1TPgROEevte596+voBLEpcw3X/ vcH/yzOFOug/xKPlGIL/RF+PkouyRD9maJIZsYpA= Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:57:50 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Greg KH , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kernel Team , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Yafang Shao Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partially revert "mm/memcontrol.c: keep local VM counters in sync with the hierarchical ones" Message-Id: <20190824125750.da9f0aac47cc0a362208f9ff@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190817191518.GB11125@castle> References: <20190817004726.2530670-1-guro@fb.com> <20190817063616.GA11747@kroah.com> <20190817191518.GB11125@castle> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:15:23 +0000 Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > Fixes: 766a4c19d880 ("mm/memcontrol.c: keep local VM counters in sync with the hierarchical ones") > > > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin > > > Cc: Yafang Shao > > > Cc: Johannes Weiner > > > --- > > > mm/memcontrol.c | 8 +++----- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > > stable kernel tree. Please read: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > > for how to do this properly. > > Oh, I'm sorry, will read and follow next time. Thanks! 766a4c19d880 is not present in 5.2 so no -stable backport is needed, yes?