From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11A9C3A589 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FED32083B for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6FED32083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 051916B02EC; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:32:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F1DB26B02EE; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:32:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DE4B66B02EF; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:32:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0055.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70046B02EC for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:32:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E735180AD802 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75825356922.29.baby26_346fd1a412526 X-HE-Tag: baby26_346fd1a412526 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4764 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Aug 2019 10:32:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,389,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="260880031" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com ([10.3.52.157]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2019 10:32:37 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:32:37 -0700 From: Ira Weiny To: Jan Kara Cc: John Hubbard , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , Jason Gunthorpe , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/gup: introduce vaddr_pin_pages_remote() Message-ID: <20190815173237.GA30924@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20190812234950.GA6455@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <38d2ff2f-4a69-e8bd-8f7c-41f1dbd80fae@nvidia.com> <20190813210857.GB12695@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <90e5cd11-fb34-6913-351b-a5cc6e24d85d@nvidia.com> <20190814234959.GA463@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <2cbdf599-2226-99ae-b4d5-8909a0a1eadf@nvidia.com> <20190815132622.GG14313@quack2.suse.cz> <20190815133510.GA21302@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190815133510.GA21302@quack2.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:35:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 15-08-19 15:26:22, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 14-08-19 20:01:07, John Hubbard wrote: > > > On 8/14/19 5:02 PM, John Hubbard wrote: > > > > > > Hold on, I *was* forgetting something: this was a two part thing, and > > > you're conflating the two points, but they need to remain separate and > > > distinct. There were: > > > > > > 1. FOLL_PIN is necessary because the caller is clearly in the use case that > > > requires it--however briefly they might be there. As Jan described it, > > > > > > "Anything that gets page reference and then touches page data (e.g. > > > direct IO) needs the new kind of tracking so that filesystem knows > > > someone is messing with the page data." [1] > > > > So when the GUP user uses MMU notifiers to stop writing to pages whenever > > they are writeprotected with page_mkclean(), they don't really need page > > pin - their access is then fully equivalent to any other mmap userspace > > access and filesystem knows how to deal with those. I forgot out this case > > when I wrote the above sentence. > > > > So to sum up there are three cases: > > 1) DIO case - GUP references to pages serving as DIO buffers are needed for > > relatively short time, no special synchronization with page_mkclean() or > > munmap() => needs FOLL_PIN > > 2) RDMA case - GUP references to pages serving as DMA buffers needed for a > > long time, no special synchronization with page_mkclean() or munmap() > > => needs FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM > > This case has also a special case when the pages are actually DAX. Then > > the caller additionally needs file lease and additional file_pin > > structure is used for tracking this usage. > > 3) ODP case - GUP references to pages serving as DMA buffers, MMU notifiers > > used to synchronize with page_mkclean() and munmap() => normal page > > references are fine. > > I want to add that I'd like to convert users in cases 1) and 2) from using > GUP to using differently named function. Users in case 3) can stay as they > are for now although ultimately I'd like to denote such use cases in a > special way as well... > Ok just to make this clear I threw up my current tree with your patches here: https://github.com/weiny2/linux-kernel/commits/mmotm-rdmafsdax-b0-v4 I'm talking about dropping the final patch: 05fd2d3afa6b rdma/umem_odp: Use vaddr_pin_pages_remote() in ODP The other 2 can stay. I split out the *_remote() call. We don't have a user but I'll keep it around for a bit. This tree is still WIP as I work through all the comments. So I've not changed names or variable types etc... Just wanted to settle this. Ira