From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
vbabka@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages separately
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:32:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809083216.GM18351@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565308665-24747-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri 09-08-19 07:57:44, Yang Shi wrote:
> When doing partial unmap to THP, the pages in the affected range would
> be considered to be reclaimable when memory pressure comes in. And,
> such pages would be put on deferred split queue and get minus from the
> memory statistics (i.e. /proc/meminfo).
>
> For example, when doing THP split test, /proc/meminfo would show:
>
> Before put on lazy free list:
> MemTotal: 45288336 kB
> MemFree: 43281376 kB
> MemAvailable: 43254048 kB
> ...
> Active(anon): 1096296 kB
> Inactive(anon): 8372 kB
> ...
> AnonPages: 1096264 kB
> ...
> AnonHugePages: 1056768 kB
>
> After put on lazy free list:
> MemTotal: 45288336 kB
> MemFree: 43282612 kB
> MemAvailable: 43255284 kB
> ...
> Active(anon): 1094228 kB
> Inactive(anon): 8372 kB
> ...
> AnonPages: 49668 kB
> ...
> AnonHugePages: 10240 kB
>
> The THPs confusingly look disappeared although they are still on LRU if
> you are not familair the tricks done by kernel.
Is this a fallout of the recent deferred freeing work?
> Accounted the lazy free pages to NR_LAZYFREE, and show them in meminfo
> and other places. With the change the /proc/meminfo would look like:
> Before put on lazy free list:
The name is really confusing because I have thought of MADV_FREE immediately.
> +LazyFreePages: Cleanly freeable pages under memory pressure (i.e. deferred
> + split THP).
What does that mean actually? I have hard time imagine what cleanly
freeable pages mean.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 23:57 Yang Shi
2019-08-08 23:57 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages into available memory Yang Shi
2019-08-09 8:32 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-08-09 16:19 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages separately Yang Shi
2019-08-09 18:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-09 18:26 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-09 23:54 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-12 9:34 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-12 17:00 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-14 11:08 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-15 4:51 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-15 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-14 12:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-15 4:54 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-14 12:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-14 12:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-15 4:53 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190809083216.GM18351@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox