From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Yafang Shao <shaoyafang@didiglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: shrink slab in node reclaim
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:35:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806073525.GC11812@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565075940-23121-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
On Tue 06-08-19 03:19:00, Yafang Shao wrote:
> In the node reclaim, may_shrinkslab is 0 by default,
> hence shrink_slab will never be performed in it.
> While shrik_slab should be performed if the relcaimable slab is over
> min slab limit.
>
> Add scan_control::no_pagecache so shrink_node can decide to reclaim page
> cache, slab, or both as dictated by min_unmapped_pages and min_slab_pages.
> shrink_node will do at least one of the two because otherwise node_reclaim
> returns early.
>
> __node_reclaim can detect when enough slab has been reclaimed because
> sc.reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab will tell us how many pages are
> reclaimed in shrink slab.
>
> This issue is very easy to produce, first you continuously cat a random
> non-exist file to produce more and more dentry, then you read big file
> to produce page cache. And finally you will find that the denty will
> never be shrunk in node reclaim (they can only be shrunk in kswapd until
> the watermark is reached).
>
> Regarding vm.zone_reclaim_mode, we always set it to zero to disable node
> reclaim. Someone may prefer to enable it if their different workloads work
> on different nodes.
Considering that this is a long term behavior of a rarely used node
reclaim I would rather not touch it unless some _real_ workload suffers
from this behavior. Or is there any reason to fix this even though there
is no evidence of real workloads suffering from the current behavior?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-06 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 7:19 Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 7:35 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-08-06 7:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 8:57 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 9:05 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 9:15 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 9:25 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 9:32 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 11:14 ` Mel Gorman
2019-08-06 11:35 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 15:59 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-08-07 1:03 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-07 15:03 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-08-06 9:50 ` Mel Gorman
2019-08-06 9:54 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 10:28 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 10:59 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 11:09 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 11:34 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 8:23 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-06 15:29 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-08-07 1:00 ` Yafang Shao
2019-08-07 15:03 ` Daniel Jordan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190806073525.GC11812@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shaoyafang@didiglobal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox