From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"n.fahldieck@profihost.ag" <n.fahldieck@profihost.ag>,
Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG <d.aberger@profihost.ag>,
p.kramme@profihost.ag
Subject: Re: No memory reclaim while reaching MemoryHigh
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:01:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190725140117.GC3582@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496dd106-abdd-3fca-06ad-ff7abaf41475@profihost.ag>
On Thu 25-07-19 15:17:17, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> i hope i added the right list and people - if i missed someone i would
> be happy to know.
>
> While using kernel 4.19.55 and cgroupv2 i set a MemoryHigh value for a
> varnish service.
>
> It happens that the varnish.service cgroup reaches it's MemoryHigh value
> and stops working due to throttling.
What do you mean by "stops working"? Does it mean that the process is
stuck in the kernel doing the reclaim? /proc/<pid>/stack would tell you
what the kernel executing for the process.
> But i don't understand is that the process itself only consumes 40% of
> it's cgroup usage.
>
> So the other 60% is dirty dentries and inode cache. If i issue an
> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> the varnish cgroup memory usage drops to the 50% of the pure process.
>
> I thought that the kernel would trigger automatic memory reclaim if a
> cgroup reaches is memory high value to drop caches.
Yes, that is indeed the case and the kernel memory (e.g. inodes/dentries
and others) should be reclaim on the way. Maybe it is harder for the
reclaim to get rid of those than drop_caches. We need more data.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 13:17 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-25 14:01 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-07-25 21:37 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-26 7:45 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-26 18:30 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-28 21:11 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-28 21:39 ` Chris Down
2019-07-29 5:34 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-29 7:07 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-29 7:45 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-07-31 13:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-25 14:53 ` Chris Down
2019-07-25 21:42 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190725140117.GC3582@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=d.aberger@profihost.ag \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n.fahldieck@profihost.ag \
--cc=p.kramme@profihost.ag \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox