linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:18:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190723151824.GL15331@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722094426.18563-5-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:44:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently nouveau_svm_fault expects nouveau_range_fault to never unlock
> mmap_sem, but the latter unlocks it for a random selection of error
> codes. Fix this up by always unlocking mmap_sem for non-zero return
> values in nouveau_range_fault, and only unlocking it in the caller
> for successful returns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index 5dd83a46578f..5de2d54b9782 100644
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -494,8 +494,10 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range)
>  	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
>  				 range->start, range->end,
>  				 PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
>  		return (int)ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
>  		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
> @@ -504,11 +506,9 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range)
>  
>  	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, true);
>  	if (ret <= 0) {
> -		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
> -			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
> -			ret = -EBUSY;
> -		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> +		if (ret == 0)
>  			ret = -EBUSY;
> +		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
>  		hmm_range_unregister(range);
>  		return ret;

Hum..

The caller does this:

again:
		ret = nouveau_range_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range);
		if (ret == 0) {
			mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
			if (!nouveau_range_done(&range)) {
				mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
				goto again;

And we can't call nouveau_range_fault() -> hmm_range_fault() without
holding the mmap_sem, so we can't allow nouveau_range_fault to unlock
it.

Maybe this instead? 

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index a9c5c58d425b3d..92cf760a9bcc5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -494,21 +494,16 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range)
 	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
 				 range->start, range->end,
 				 PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret) {
-		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
+	if (ret)
 		return (int)ret;
-	}
 
-	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
-		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
+	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT))
 		return -EBUSY;
-	}
 
 	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, true);
 	if (ret <= 0) {
 		if (ret == 0)
 			ret = -EBUSY;
-		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
 		hmm_range_unregister(range);
 		return ret;
 	}
@@ -706,8 +701,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 						NULL);
 			svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
 			mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
-			up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
 		}
+		up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
 
 		/* Cancel any faults in the window whose pages didn't manage
 		 * to keep their valid bit, or stay writeable when required.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22  9:44 hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-22  9:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault,snapshot} Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-22 14:37   ` Souptick Joarder
2019-07-23 14:54     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 16:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 17:18         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22  9:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: move hmm_vma_range_done and hmm_vma_fault to nouveau Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 14:55   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22  9:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] nouveau: remove the block parameter to nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 14:56   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 16:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-22  9:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 15:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-07-23 16:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 17:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 17:23         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 17:30           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22  9:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] nouveau: return -EBUSY when hmm_range_wait_until_valid fails Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 15:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22  9:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23  1:11 ` hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v2 Ralph Campbell
2019-07-23 15:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 15:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 16:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-03 22:02 Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190723151824.GL15331@mellanox.com \
    --to=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox