From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Felix.Kuehling@amd.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 hmm 05/12] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:01:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624210110.5098-6-jgg@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624210110.5098-1-jgg@ziepe.ca>
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
The wait_event_timeout macro already tests the condition as its first
action, so there is no reason to open code another version of this, all
that does is skip the might_sleep() debugging in common cases, which is
not helpful.
Further, based on prior patches, we can now simplify the required condition
test:
- If range is valid memory then so is range->hmm
- If hmm_release() has run then range->valid is set to false
at the same time as dead, so no reason to check both.
- A valid hmm has a valid hmm->mm.
Allowing the return value of wait_event_timeout() (along with its internal
barriers) to compute the result of the function.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
---
v3
- Simplify the wait_event_timeout to not check valid
---
include/linux/hmm.h | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 1d97b6d62c5bcf..26e7c477490c4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -209,17 +209,8 @@ static inline unsigned long hmm_range_page_size(const struct hmm_range *range)
static inline bool hmm_range_wait_until_valid(struct hmm_range *range,
unsigned long timeout)
{
- /* Check if mm is dead ? */
- if (range->hmm == NULL || range->hmm->dead || range->hmm->mm == NULL) {
- range->valid = false;
- return false;
- }
- if (range->valid)
- return true;
- wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid || range->hmm->dead,
- msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
- /* Return current valid status just in case we get lucky */
- return range->valid;
+ return wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(timeout)) != 0;
}
/*
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 21:00 [PATCH v4 hmm 00/12] Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 01/12] mm/hmm: fix use after free with struct hmm in the mmu notifiers Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 02/12] mm/hmm: Use hmm_mirror not mm as an argument for hmm_range_register Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 03/12] mm/hmm: Hold a mmgrab from hmm to mm Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 04/12] mm/hmm: Simplify hmm_get_or_create and make it reliable Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-25 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 21:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 06/12] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 07/12] mm/hmm: Hold on to the mmget for the lifetime of the range Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 08/12] mm/hmm: Use lockdep instead of comments Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 09/12] mm/hmm: Remove racy protection against double-unregistration Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 10/12] mm/hmm: Poison hmm_range during unregister Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 11/12] mm/hmm: Remove confusing comment and logic from hmm_release Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-25 7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 12/12] mm/hmm: Fix error flows in hmm_invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 18:18 ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-27 16:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-29 1:26 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 00/12] Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624210110.5098-6-jgg@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox