From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Felix.Kuehling@amd.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 hmm 11/12] mm/hmm: Remove confusing comment and logic from hmm_release
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:01:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624210110.5098-12-jgg@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624210110.5098-1-jgg@ziepe.ca>
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
hmm_release() is called exactly once per hmm. ops->release() cannot
accidentally trigger any action that would recurse back onto
hmm->mirrors_sem.
This fixes a use after-free race of the form:
CPU0 CPU1
hmm_release()
up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
hmm_mirror_unregister(mirror)
down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
kfree(mirror)
mirror->ops->release(mirror)
The only user we have today for ops->release is an empty function, so this
is unambiguously safe.
As a consequence of plugging this race drivers are not allowed to
register/unregister mirrors from within a release op.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
---
mm/hmm.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index c30aa9403dbe4d..b224ea635a7716 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -130,26 +130,16 @@ static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
WARN_ON(!list_empty_careful(&hmm->ranges));
- down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
- mirror = list_first_entry_or_null(&hmm->mirrors, struct hmm_mirror,
- list);
- while (mirror) {
- list_del_init(&mirror->list);
- if (mirror->ops->release) {
- /*
- * Drop mirrors_sem so the release callback can wait
- * on any pending work that might itself trigger a
- * mmu_notifier callback and thus would deadlock with
- * us.
- */
- up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
+ down_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
+ list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) {
+ /*
+ * Note: The driver is not allowed to trigger
+ * hmm_mirror_unregister() from this thread.
+ */
+ if (mirror->ops->release)
mirror->ops->release(mirror);
- down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
- }
- mirror = list_first_entry_or_null(&hmm->mirrors,
- struct hmm_mirror, list);
}
- up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
+ up_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
hmm_put(hmm);
}
@@ -279,7 +269,7 @@ void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror)
struct hmm *hmm = mirror->hmm;
down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
- list_del_init(&mirror->list);
+ list_del(&mirror->list);
up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
hmm_put(hmm);
}
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 21:00 [PATCH v4 hmm 00/12] Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 01/12] mm/hmm: fix use after free with struct hmm in the mmu notifiers Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 02/12] mm/hmm: Use hmm_mirror not mm as an argument for hmm_range_register Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 03/12] mm/hmm: Hold a mmgrab from hmm to mm Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 04/12] mm/hmm: Simplify hmm_get_or_create and make it reliable Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-25 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 05/12] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 06/12] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 07/12] mm/hmm: Hold on to the mmget for the lifetime of the range Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 08/12] mm/hmm: Use lockdep instead of comments Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 09/12] mm/hmm: Remove racy protection against double-unregistration Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 10/12] mm/hmm: Poison hmm_range during unregister Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-06-25 7:03 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 11/12] mm/hmm: Remove confusing comment and logic from hmm_release Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 21:01 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 12/12] mm/hmm: Fix error flows in hmm_invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 18:18 ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-27 16:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-29 1:26 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 00/12] Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624210110.5098-12-jgg@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox