From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/sparse: set section nid for hot-add memory
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:53:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190619075347.GA22552@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190619062330.GB5717@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:23:30AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 18-06-19 08:55:37, Wei Yang wrote:
> > In case of NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS is set, we store section's node id in
> > section_to_node_table[]. While for hot-add memory, this is missed.
> > Without this information, page_to_nid() may not give the right node id.
>
> Which would mean that NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS doesn't really work with
> the hotpluged memory, right? Any idea why nobody has noticed this
> so far? Is it because NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS is rare and essentially
> unused with the hotplug? page_to_nid providing an incorrect result
> sounds quite serious to me.
The thing is that for NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS to be enabled we need to run out of
space in page->flags to store zone, nid and section.
Currently, even with the largest values (with pagetable level 5), that is not
possible on x86_64.
It is possible though, that somewhere in the future, when the values get larger
(e.g: we add more zones, NODE_SHIFT grows, or we need more space to store
the section) we finally run out of room for the flags though.
I am not sure about the other arches though, we probably should audit them
and see which ones can fall in there.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-18 0:55 Wei Yang
2019-06-18 7:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-18 8:32 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-18 8:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-19 6:10 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-19 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-19 9:01 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-19 9:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-19 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-19 9:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-19 6:23 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-19 7:53 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2019-06-19 8:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-19 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-19 9:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-19 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-19 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190619075347.GA22552@linux \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox