From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm, oom: fix oom_unkillable_task for memcg OOMs
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:12:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617231207.160865-2-shakeelb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617231207.160865-1-shakeelb@google.com>
Currently oom_unkillable_task() checks mems_allowed even for memcg OOMs
which does not make sense as memcg OOMs can not be triggered due to
numa constraints. Fixing that.
This commit also removed the bogus usage of oom_unkillable_task() from
oom_badness(). Currently reading /proc/[pid]/oom_score will do a bogus
cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects() check. Removing that.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
---
Changelog since v1:
- Divide the patch into two patches.
fs/proc/base.c | 3 +--
include/linux/oom.h | 1 -
mm/oom_kill.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index b8d5d100ed4a..57b7a0d75ef5 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -532,8 +532,7 @@ static int proc_oom_score(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
unsigned long totalpages = totalram_pages() + total_swap_pages;
unsigned long points = 0;
- points = oom_badness(task, NULL, NULL, totalpages) *
- 1000 / totalpages;
+ points = oom_badness(task, totalpages) * 1000 / totalpages;
seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", points);
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index d07992009265..c696c265f019 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static inline vm_fault_t check_stable_address_space(struct mm_struct *mm)
bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
unsigned long totalpages);
extern bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc);
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index bd80997e0969..d779d9da1069 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -152,20 +152,23 @@ static inline bool is_memcg_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
}
/* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */
-static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p,
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask)
+static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p, struct oom_control *oc)
{
if (is_global_init(p))
return true;
if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
return true;
- /* When mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() and p is not member of the group */
- if (memcg && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, memcg))
- return true;
+ /*
+ * For memcg OOM, we reach here through mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(), no
+ * need to check p's memcg membership and the checks after this
+ * are irrelevant for memcg OOMs.
+ */
+ if (is_memcg_oom(oc))
+ return false;
/* p may not have freeable memory in nodemask */
- if (!has_intersects_mems_allowed(p, nodemask))
+ if (!has_intersects_mems_allowed(p, oc->nodemask))
return true;
return false;
@@ -201,13 +204,12 @@ static bool is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(void)
* predictable as possible. The goal is to return the highest value for the
* task consuming the most memory to avoid subsequent oom failures.
*/
-unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- const nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned long totalpages)
+unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long totalpages)
{
long points;
long adj;
- if (oom_unkillable_task(p, memcg, nodemask))
+ if (is_global_init(p) || p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
return 0;
p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
@@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
struct oom_control *oc = arg;
unsigned long points;
- if (oom_unkillable_task(task, NULL, oc->nodemask))
+ if (oom_unkillable_task(task, oc))
goto next;
/*
@@ -342,7 +344,7 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
goto select;
}
- points = oom_badness(task, NULL, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages);
+ points = oom_badness(task, oc->totalpages);
if (!points || points < oc->chosen_points)
goto next;
@@ -390,7 +392,7 @@ static int dump_task(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
struct oom_control *oc = arg;
struct task_struct *task;
- if (oom_unkillable_task(p, NULL, oc->nodemask))
+ if (oom_unkillable_task(p, oc))
return 0;
task = find_lock_task_mm(p);
@@ -1090,7 +1092,7 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
check_panic_on_oom(oc, constraint);
if (!is_memcg_oom(oc) && sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task &&
- current->mm && !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, oc->nodemask) &&
+ current->mm && !oom_unkillable_task(current, oc) &&
current->signal->oom_score_adj != OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
get_task_struct(current);
oc->chosen = current;
--
2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 23:12 [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, oom: refactor dump_tasks " Shakeel Butt
2019-06-17 23:12 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2019-06-18 12:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm, oom: fix oom_unkillable_task " Michal Hocko
2019-06-18 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, oom: refactor dump_tasks " Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190617231207.160865-2-shakeelb@google.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox